Commentary on Manne et al.: Using the Interdependence Model to Understand Spousal Influence on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intentions: a Structural Equation Model
- Mariët Hagedoorn Ph.D.
- … show all 1 hide
Preventive colorectal cancer screening can significantly reduce mortality, but unfortunately, the participation in screening is still relatively low . Although existing individual level models (e.g., health belief model) have increased our understanding of colorectal cancer screening behavior, the empirical evidence for the associations between many individual level factors and screening behavior is still limited . Manne and colleagues  argued convincingly that a greater understanding of the role of one's significant other in screening intentions might help improve screening rates. The dyadic approach posits that members of couples are interdependent and influence each other's attitudes, behaviors, and health outcomes [cf. 4]. Put differently, participation in screening is not based only on individual factors but also on the interaction with one's intimate partner. In line with this idea, they found agreement with respect to screening practices in 65% of the couples.
- US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/. Accessed February 6, 2012.
- Kiviniemi MT, Bennett A, Zaiter M, Marshall JR. Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: A review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior. Psycho-Oncology 2011;20:1023–1033. CrossRef
- Manne S, Kashy D, Weinberg DS, Boscarino JA, Bowen DJ. Using the interdependence model to understand spousal influence on colorectal cancer screening intentions: A structural equation model. Ann Beh Med. 2012. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9344-y.
- Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks H, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:1–30. CrossRef
- Davis JL, Rusbult CE. Attitude alignment in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81:65–84. CrossRef
- Sheeran P. Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M, eds. European review of social psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2002:1–36.
- Ouellette JA, Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull. 1998;124:54–74. CrossRef
- Commentary on Manne et al.: Using the Interdependence Model to Understand Spousal Influence on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intentions: a Structural Equation Model
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 3 , pp 284-285
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Health Sciences, Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713, AV Groningen, The Netherlands