American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2011, Atlanta: American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/index
. Accessed 12 April 2011.
US Dept of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2010/
. Accessed 12 April 2011.
Beydoun HA., Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Contr. 2008; 9: 339-359.
McQueen A., Vernon SW, Rothman AJ., Norman GJ, Myers RE, Tilley BC. Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior. Ann Behav Med
. 2010; 40: 205–217.PubMedCrossRef
Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goal V. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med
, 2003; 25: 87–94.CrossRef
Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, Meropol NJ, Haller D, Rakowski W, Babb J, Jandorf L. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psych.
2002; 21: 3–15.CrossRef
Harris JN, Hay J., Kuniyiki A., Asgari MM, Press N, Bowen DJ. Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families. Psych Onc.
2010; 19: 1102–1111.CrossRef
Falba TA, Sindelar JL. Spousal concordance in health behavior change. Health Serv Res
. 2008; 43: 96–116.PubMedCrossRef
Kolonel LN, Lee J. Husband-wife correspondence in smoking, drinking, and dietary habits. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998; 34: 99–104.
Wilson SE. The health capital of families: An investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status. Soc Sci Med
. 2002; 55: 1157–1172.PubMedCrossRef
Lewis MA, DeVellis BM, Sleath. Social influence and interpersonal communication in health behavior. In: Glanz DK, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. 3rd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002: 240–264.
Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI, Puleo E, Butterfield RM, Emmons KM. Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Soc Sci Med
. 2006; 62:
Kelley HH, Berscheid E, Christensen A, Harvey JH, Huston TL, Levinger G, et al. Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley HH, Berscheid E, Christensen A, Harvey J, Huston TL, Levinger G, et al eds. Close relationships. San Francisco, CA: Freeman; 1983; 20–67.
Kelley HH, Thibaut TW. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York; Wiley; 1978.
Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM. Interdependence processes. In Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW eds. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles New York: The Guilford Press; 1996: 564–596.
Lewis MA, Butterfield R, Darbes L, Johnston-Brooks CH. The conceptualization and assessment of health-related social control. J Soc Pers Rel
. 2004; 21: 669–687.CrossRef
Franks MM, Rook KS, Keteyian SJ, Stephens MA, Franklin BA, Artinian NT. Spouses' provision of health-related support and control to patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation. J Fam Psychol
. 2006; 20: 311–318.PubMedCrossRef
Butterfield R, Lewis M. Health-related social influence: A social ecological perspective on tactic use. J Soc Pers Rel
. 2002; 19: 505–626.CrossRef
Lewis MA. Butterfield R. Antecedents and reactions to health-related social control. Pers Soc Psych Bull.
2005; 31: 416–427.CrossRef
Lewis MA, Rook KS. Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol.
1991; 18: 63–71.CrossRef
Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Dube CE. Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of stage of adoption. Ann Behav Med
. 1996; 18: 91–100.CrossRef
Sharpley CE., Rogers HJ. Preliminary validation of the Abbreviated Spanier Dyadic Adjustment scale: Some psychometric data regarding a screening test of marital adjustment. Educ Psych Meas
. 1984; 44: 1045–1050.CrossRef
Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press: 2006.
Miller GR, Bostner F. Persuasion in personal relationships. In: S. Duck, ed. A handbook of personal relationships New York: Wiley; 1988: 275–288.
Cutrona C. Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996.
Gregory TA, Wilson C, Duncan A, Turnbull D, Cole SR, Young G. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. BMC Pub Health
. 2011; 11: 38.CrossRef
Power E, Van Jaarsveld C, McCaffery K, Miles A, Atkin W, Wardle J. Understanding intentions and action in colorectal cancer screening. Ann Beh Med
. 2008; 35: 285–294.CrossRef
Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
Krosnick, J, Chang, L. A comparison of the random digit dialing telephone survey methodology with internet survey methodology as implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive. In: Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2001: Montreal, Canada.
Dennis, M. Are internet panels creating professional respondents? The benefits of online panels far outweigh the potential for panel effects. Marketing Research. 2001; 13(Summer): 34–38.