Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 320–329

Using the Interdependence Model to Understand Spousal Influence on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intentions: A Structural Equation Model

  • Sharon Manne
  • Deborah Kashy
  • David S. Weinberg
  • Joseph A. Boscarino
  • Deborah J. Bowen
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12160-012-9344-y

Cite this article as:
Manne, S., Kashy, D., Weinberg, D.S. et al. ann. behav. med. (2012) 43: 320. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9344-y



Although it is widely thought that the marital relationship plays a role in individuals’ decisions to have colorectal cancer screening, few studies have evaluated partner influences.


We evaluated the role of marital relationship factors such as a relational perspective on the frequency of spouse discussions about screening and screening intentions. Individual-level factors were also evaluated.


One hundred sixty-eight couples with both members non-adherent with screening completed measures of perceived risk, screening benefits and barriers, marital quality, relational perspective, discussion frequency, and screening intentions.


Couples’ attitudes about screening were interdependent and one partner’s attitudes and behavior were associated with the other partner’s intention. There was also evidence of joint effects in that intentions were associated with both one’s partner’s attitudes and one’s own attitudes.


Colorectal screening intentions are associated with both partners’ attitudes as well as whether or not couples have discussed screening with one another.


Interdependence model Couples Colorectal cancer screening intentions Actor-partner independence model 

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Manne
    • 1
  • Deborah Kashy
    • 2
  • David S. Weinberg
    • 3
  • Joseph A. Boscarino
    • 4
  • Deborah J. Bowen
    • 5
  1. 1.UMDNJ/Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Fox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Geisinger Health SystemsDanvilleUSA
  5. 5.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations