Behavioral Frequency Moderates the Effects of Message Framing on HPV Vaccine Acceptability
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Research suggests that gain-framed messages are generally more effective than loss-framed messages at promoting preventive health behaviors. Virtually all previous studies, however, have examined prevention behaviors that require regular and repeated action to be effective. Little is known about the utility of message framing for promoting low-frequency prevention behaviors such as vaccination. Moreover, few studies have identified mediators of framing effects.
We investigated whether behavioral frequency (operationalized as the number of shots required) moderated the effect of framed health messages on women’s intentions to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. We also sought to identify mediators of framing effects.
Undergraduate women (N = 237) were randomly assigned to read an HPV vaccination booklet that varied by message frame (gain vs. loss) and behavioral frequency (one shot vs. six shots).
We observed a frame-by-frequency interaction such that the loss-framed message led to greater vaccination intentions than did the gain-framed message but only among participants in the one-shot condition. Perceived susceptibility to HPV infection mediated the observed framing effects.
This study provides an important exception to the commonly observed gain-framed advantage for preventive health behaviors. Loss-framed appeals appear to be particularly effective in promoting interest in low-frequency prevention behaviors such as HPV vaccination.
- Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, Salovey P. The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote health behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun. 2006; 56Suppl: S202–S220. CrossRef
- Abood DA, Coster DC, Mullis AK, Black DR. Evaluation of a “loss-framed” minimal intervention to increase mammography utilization among medically un- and under-insured women. Cancer Detec Prev. 2002; 26: 394–400. CrossRef
- Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey P. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol. 2003; 22: 60–67. CrossRef
- Detweiler JB, Bedell BT, Salovey P, Pronin E, Rothman AJ. Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 189–196. CrossRef
- Robberson MR, Rogers RW. Beyond fear appeals: negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1988; 13: 277–287. CrossRef
- Schneider TR, Salovey P, Apanovitch AM, et al. The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychol. 2001; 20: 256–266. CrossRef
- Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, et al. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2007; 56: 1–24.
- Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47: 263–291. CrossRef
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981; 211: 453–458. CrossRef
- Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997; 121: 3–19. CrossRef
- Kiene SM, Barta WD, Zelenski JM, Cothran DL. Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 321–326. CrossRef
- Lauver D, Rubin M. Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Res Nurs Health. 1990; 13: 199–207. CrossRef
- Lerman C, Ross E, Boyce A, et al. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 729–730. CrossRef
- Scott LB, Curbow B. The effect of message frames and CVD risk factors on behavioral outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2006; 30: 582–597.
- McCaul KD, Johnson RJ, Rothman AJ. The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychol. 2002; 21: 624–628. CrossRef
- Rothman AJ, Martino SC, Bedell BT, Detweiler JB, Salovey P. The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999; 11: 1355–1369. CrossRef
- Gerend MA, Shepherd JE. Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 745–752.
- Mann T, Sherman D, Updegraff J. Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 330–334. CrossRef
- Millar MG, Millar KU. Promoting safe driving behaviors: the influences of message framing and issue involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000; 30: 853–856. CrossRef
- Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Antone C, Keough K, Martin CD. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1993; 29: 408–433. CrossRef
- Bekker HL, Gough D, Williams M. Attendance choices about the influenza immunization programme: Evidence for targeting patients’ beliefs. Psychol Health Med. 2003; 8: 279–288. CrossRef
- Smith A, Yarwood J, Salisbury DM. Tracking mother’s attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996–2006. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 3996–4002. CrossRef
- Weinstein ND, Kwitel A, McCaul KD, et al. Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 146–151. CrossRef
- Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 52: 500–510. CrossRef
- Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Educ Res. 1992; 7: 107–116. CrossRef
- Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15: 175–183.
- Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 136–145. CrossRef
- Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington JE. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals Behav Med. 2004; 27: 125–130. CrossRef
- Moscicki AB. Impact of HPV infection in adolescent populations. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37Suppl. 1: S3–S9. CrossRef
- Baseman JG, Koutsky LA. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol. 2005; 32Suppl. 1: S16–S24. CrossRef
- Bryan AD, Aiken LS, West SG. Young women’s condom use: the influence of acceptance of sexuality, control over the sexual encounter, and perceived susceptibility to common STDs. Health Psychol. 1997; 16: 468–479. CrossRef
- Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage; 1991.
- Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182. CrossRef
- Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation modeling. In: Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology. Washington, DC, USA: American Sociological Association; 1982: 290–312.
- Behavioral Frequency Moderates the Effects of Message Framing on HPV Vaccine Acceptability
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 35, Issue 2 , pp 221-229
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Message framing
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine
- Mediators of framing effects
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4300, USA
- 2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4300, USA
- 3. Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4300, USA