Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge
First Online: 18 June 2010 Received: 07 May 2009 Accepted: 04 December 2009 DOI:
Cite this article as: Glannon, W. Neuroethics (2011) 4: 191. doi:10.1007/s12152-010-9081-5 Abstract
In “Minds, Brains, and Norms,” Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson claim that the idea that ‘you are your brain’ does not contribute to a plausible account of human behavior. I argue that they leave too little of the brain in their account of different types of behavior.
Keywords Brain Mind Behavior Empirical explanations Conceptual explanations Wittgenstein References
Pardo, M. S., and D. Patterson. 2010. Minds, brains, and norms.
Neuroethics 3: ??.
Wittgenstein, L. 1958.
Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan, 208.
Bunge, S.A., and J.D. Wallis (eds.). 2008.
Neuroscience of rule-guided behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scoville, W.B., and B. Milner. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Damasio, H., T. Grabowski, R. Frank, A.M. Galabarda, and A. Damasio. 1994. The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient.
Damasio, A. 2004.
Descartes error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain, Ch. 1. New York: Grosett/Putnam.
Burns, J.M., and R.H. Swerdlaw. 2003. Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia.
Archives of Neurology
Roskies, A.L. 2008. Neuroimaging and inferential distance.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010