Are Head Coaches in Intercollegiate Athletics Perceived as Masculine? An Evaluation of Gender Stereotypes and the Effect of Sexism on Intercollegiate Coaches
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study focused on determining if gender stereotypes existed in intercollegiate athletics in relation to coaches, and if the discourse was enveloped within sexist beliefs. Specifically, we tested the relationship modern sexism had with traits ascribed to successful head coaches. Results indicated no gender differences in the traits ascribed to head coaches. Further, modern sexism did not moderate the relationship between gender and masculinity scores for the head coach. This research study bolsters previous research in that we found no gender differences in ascribed leadership traits, and expands the literature about sexism in sport.
- Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (2008). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal national study—Thirty-one year update. Unpublished manuscript, Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College.
- Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (2002). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal study—Twenty-five year update. Unpublished manuscript. Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College.
- Aicher, T. J., & Sagas, M. (2009). Sexist beliefs affect perceived treatment discrimination among coaches in division I intercollegiate athletics. International Journal of Sport Management, 10, 243–262.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. CrossRef
- Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem sex role inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
- Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662–669. CrossRef
- Cralley, E. L., & Ruscher, J. B. (2005). Lady, girl, or woman: Sexism and cognitive busyness predict use of gender-biased nouns. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 300–314. CrossRef
- Cunningham, G. B., & Sagas, M. (2008). Gender and sex diversity in sport organizations: Introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 58, 3–9. CrossRef
- Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insiduous dangers of benevloent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. CrossRef
- Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. CrossRef
- Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. CrossRef
- Fernandez, M. L., Castro, Y. R., Otero, M. C., Foltz, M. L., & Lorenzo, M. G. (2006). Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choices. Sex Roles, 55, 267–272. CrossRef
- Fielding-Lloyd, B., & Mean, L. J. (2008). Standards and separatism: The discursive construction of gender in English soccer coach education. Sex Roles, 58, 24–39. CrossRef
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. CrossRef
- Kennedy, C. L. (2009). The glass ceiling on the playing fields report card III. Gender Issues, 26, 238–246. CrossRef
- Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609–615. CrossRef
- Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender stereotypes: Have times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177–193. CrossRef
- Russel, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573. CrossRef
- Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688. CrossRef
- Schein, V. E., & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 439–447. CrossRef
- Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 103–110. CrossRef
- Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager—think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33–41. CrossRef
- Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of think manager—think male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353–363. CrossRef
- Shaw, S., & Frisby, W. (2006). Can gender equity be more equitable? Promoting an alternative frame for sport management research, education, and practice. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 483–509.
- Shaw, S., & Hoeber, L. (2003). A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch: Gender discourses and their influence on employment roles in sports organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 347–375.
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The attitudes toward women scale. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 1–52.
- Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51, 117–128. CrossRef
- Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pariel. Personality and Social Psycology Bulletin, 21, 842–849. CrossRef
- Are Head Coaches in Intercollegiate Athletics Perceived as Masculine? An Evaluation of Gender Stereotypes and the Effect of Sexism on Intercollegiate Coaches
Volume 27, Issue 3-4 , pp 165-174
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links