College Students’ Life Priorities: The Influence of Gender and Gender-linked Personality Traits
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study examined relations between gender-linked personality traits (i.e., agency and communion) and life goals in a sample of 237 undergraduates. In addition, gender similarities and differences in the relative importance of life goals were explored. As predicted, agency was positively associated with the importance of most achievement goals such as having a career, whereas communion and unmitigated communion were positively associated with the importance of relational goals such as romantic partnership. Contrary to predictions, results suggested that men were more willing than women to sacrifice some achievement goals for a romantic relationship. Findings point to the potential influence of gender and gender-linked personality traits on the establishment of life priorities.
- Abele, A. E. (2000). A dual impact model of gender and career related processes. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. CrossRef
- Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66. CrossRef
- Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203. CrossRef
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Berkman, L. F., & Breslow, L. (1983). Health and ways of living: The Alameda County study. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bruch, M. A. (2002). The relevance of mitigated and unmitigated agency and communion for depression vulnerabilities and dysphoria. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 449–459. CrossRef
- Burda, P. C., Vaux, A., & Schill, T. (1984). Social support resources: Variation across sex and sex role. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 119–126. CrossRef
- Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363. CrossRef
- Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Fritz, H. L. (2000). Gender-linked personality traits predict mental health and functional status following a first coronary event. Health Psychology, 19, 420–428. CrossRef
- Fritz, H. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and overinvolvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 121–140. CrossRef
- Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115. CrossRef
- Green, R. J., & Hill, J. H. (2003). Sex and higher education: Do men and women attend college for different reasons? College Student Journal, 37, 557–563.
- Greene, A. L., & Wheatley, S. M. (1992). ‘I’ve got a lot to do and I don’t think I’ll have the time’: Gender differences in late adolescents’ narratives of the future. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 667–686. CrossRef
- Hammersla, J. F., & Frease-McMahan, L. (1990). University students’ priorities: Life goals vs. relationships. Sex Roles, 23, 1–14. CrossRef
- Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Implications of agency and communion for patient and spouse adjustment to a first coronary event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 807–816. CrossRef
- Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. CrossRef
- Helgeson, V. S. (1995). Masculinity, men’s roles, and coronary heart disease. In D. F. Sabo & D. F. Gordon (Eds.), Men’s health and illness: Gender, power, and the body. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1996). Implications of unmitigated communion and communion for adolescent adjustment to type I diabetes. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 2, 163–188.
- Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183. CrossRef
- Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158. CrossRef
- Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057. CrossRef
- Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723. CrossRef
- Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 22, 58–71. CrossRef
- Kerpelman, J. L., & Schvaneveldt, P. L. (1999). Young adults’ anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different role balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41, 189–217. CrossRef
- Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503. CrossRef
- Litwak, E., & Messeri, P. (1989). Organizational theory, social supports, and mortality rates: A theoretical convergence. American Sociological Review, 54, 49–66. CrossRef
- Livingston, M. M., Burley, K., & Springer, T. P. (1996). The importance of being feminine: Gender, sex role, occupational and marital role commitment, and their relationship to anticipated work-family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 179–192.
- McAdams, D. P., Jackson, R. J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 52, 261–273. CrossRef
- Mongrain, M., & Zuroff, D. C. (1995). Motivational and affective correlates of dependency and self-criticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 347–354. CrossRef
- Mosher, C. E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2005). Agentic and communal personality traits: Relations to attitudes toward sex and sexual experiences. Sex Roles, 52, 122–129. CrossRef
- Novack, L. L., & Novack, D. R. (1996). Being female in the eighties and nineties: Conflicts between new opportunities and traditional expectations among white, middle class, heterosexual college women. Sex Roles, 35, 57–77. CrossRef
- Orlofsky, J. L., & O’Heron, C. A. (1987). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations: Implications for personal adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1034–1042. CrossRef
- Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Sex differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments. Sex Roles, 7, 821–835. CrossRef
- Saragovi, C., Aubé, J., Koestner, R., & Zuroff, D. (2002). Traits, motives, and depressive styles as reflections of agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 563–577. CrossRef
- Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Di Dio, L., & Aubé, J. (1997). Agency, communion, and well-being: Extending Helgeson’s (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609. CrossRef
- Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1993). Gender differences and similarities between male and female undergraduate students regarding expectations for career and family roles. College Student Journal, 27, 237–249.
- Shulman, S., & Scharf, M. (2000). Adolescent romantic behaviors and perceptions: Age- and gender-related differences, and links with family and peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 99–118. CrossRef
- Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682. CrossRef
- Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the ‘Romantic Beliefs Scale’ and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411. CrossRef
- Thorn, B. L., & Gilbert, L. A. (1998). Antecedents of work and family role expectations of college men. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 259–267. CrossRef
- Willinger, B. (1993). Resistance and change: College men’s attitudes toward family and work in the 1980s. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family: Research on men and masculinity series (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- College Students’ Life Priorities: The Influence of Gender and Gender-linked Personality Traits
Volume 24, Issue 2 , pp 21-33
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links