Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who’s got the Upper Hand? Hand Holding Behaviors Among Romantic Couples and Families

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hand holding behavior of romantic couples and family dyads (n = 886) in public locations around Myrtle Beach, South Carolina was observed. Over 90 % of males in heterosexual romantic couples, parents in parent child pairs, and older siblings in child sibling pairs tended to place their hand on top when holding hands, displaying what we consider social dominance. Women holding hands with men in romantic relationships placed their hand under their partner’s hand, and women switched to have their hand on top when holding hands with a child. Results are discussed in relation to social dominance theory and social role theory, along with implications for equality among the sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borden, R. J., & Homleid, F. M. (1978). Handedness and lateral positioning in heterosexual couples: Are men still strong-arming women? Sex Roles, 4, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418. doi:10.1177/0956797611420445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: The Free Press.

  • Chapell, M., Basso, E., DeCola, A., Hossack, J., Keebler, J., Marm, J., et al. (1998). Men and women holding hands: Whose hand is uppermost? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 127–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapell, M., Beltran, W., Santanello, M., Takahashi, M., Bantom, S. R., Donovan, J., et al. (1999). Men and women holding hands: II. Whose hand is uppermost? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 537–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1996). Differences between women and men: their magnitude, practical importance, and political meaning. American Psychologist, 51(2), 158–159. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce (2010). Myrtle Beach area data & statistics. Retrieved from http://www.myrtlebeachareachamber.com/research/data_and_statistics.html. Accessed 1 May 2010.

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2012). Social dominance theory. In P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 418–438). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry F. Pettijohn II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettijohn, T.F., Ahmed, S.F., Dunlap, A.V. et al. Who’s got the Upper Hand? Hand Holding Behaviors Among Romantic Couples and Families. Curr Psychol 32, 217–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9175-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9175-4

Keywords

Navigation