Abstract
The authors of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) and its extension, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) recommend that researchers who use these theories to investigate the determinants of a given behaviour should first conduct an elicitation study to identify the modal salient beliefs in the target population. In spite of the importance accorded to salient beliefs by the TRA/TPB, the elicitation stage has received little research attention. This paper reports a detailed analysis of beliefs about “being more physically active in the next 12 months.” A general population sample of 213 adults completed a questionnaire while attending a research centre for a series of tests. The findings showed that the beliefs that were elicited by questions designed to prompt affective outcomes (like or enjoy, dislike or hate) differed systematically from those that were elicited by the traditional questions designed to prompt instrumental out-comes (advantages and disadvantages). Whether this resulted in different final sets of modal salient beliefs was found to depend on the particular decision rule that was employed. An alternative decision rule is proposed, based on maximizing the degree of overlap between the modal set and the full set of salient beliefs generated by the sample. The index of overlap can be used to gauge the adequacy of using a modal set of a given size to represent the salient beliefs of the whole sample. In the current dataset, the optimal modal set for “advantages and disadvantages” was associated with only 26 percent overlap with the salient beliefs of the whole sample, which was judged to be insufficient. In such cases, a better strategy may be to ask participants to generate and rate their own beliefs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, C.R. (1998). Modal versus individually-derived beliefs about condom use: Measuring the cognitive underpinnings of the theory of reasoned action. Psychology and Health, 13, 271–287.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioural, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Leisure Sciences, 13, 185–204.
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 207–224.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein. M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behaviour relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intention, and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.
Ajzen, I., & Timko, C. (1986). Correspondence between health attitudes and behaviour. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 259–276.
Evans, M. G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites. American Psychologist, 46, 6–15.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
French, D. P., & Hankins, M. (2003). The expectancy-value muddle in the theory of planned behaviour—and some proposed solutions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 37–55.
Godin, G. (1987). Importance of the emotional aspect of attitude to predict intention. Psychological Reports, 67, 719–723.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, pp. 133–168. New York: The Guilford Press.
Manstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 69–95.
Newcombe, R. G., & Altman, D. G. (2000). Proportions and their differences. In D. G. Altman, D. Machin, T. N. Bryant, & M. J. Gardner (Eds.), Statistics with confidence (2nd ed.). pp. 45–56. London: BMJ books.
Rutter, D. R., & Bunce, D. J. (1989). The theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A test of Towriss's amended procedure for measuring beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 39–46.
Valois, P., Desharnais, R., & Godin, G. (1988). A comparison of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitudinal models for the prediction of exercise intention and behaviour. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 11, 459–472.
Wareham. N. J., Hennings, S.J., Prentice, A. M., & Day, N. E. (1997). Feasibility of heart-rate monitoring to estimate total level and pattern of energy expenditure in a population-based epidemiological study: The Ely young cohort feasibility study 1994-5. British Journal of Nutrition, 78, 889–900.
Wareham, N. J., Wong, M.-Y., & Day, N. E. (2000). Glucose intolerance and physical inactivity: The relative importance of low habitual energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory fitness. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 132–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutton, S., French, D.P., Hennings, S.J. et al. Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording. Curr Psychol 22, 234–251 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1019-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1019-1