Date: 07 Oct 2009
The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China
- Giuseppe Balducci
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In recent years an increasing number of works on EU international actorness have begun to focus on notions of “normative, value-driven external policy”. However, the majority of these works tend to uncritically analyse EU foreign policy without considering its internal complexity and the existing national, supranational and intergovernmental dynamics. This paper first sheds light on these issues by proposing an original theoretical and analytical framework to study European, rather than merely EU, normative foreign policy. Secondly, this paper attempts to empirically apply such a framework in the specific case of European human rights promotion in China. What emerges is that in the case of China, and Asia more broadly, Europe appears more as a normative trap, where the interaction of EU institutions and member states originate policies not in line with the EU human rights normative basis.
Balme, R. (2008). The European Union, China and Human Rights. In Z. Laïdi (Ed.), The EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Normative Power and Social Preferences (pp. 143-173), London & New York: Routledge/Garnet
Baker, P. (2002). Human Rights, Europe and the People’s Republic of China. The China Quarterly, 169, 45-63.
Bretherton, C. & Vogler, J. (1999). The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Chang, P. & Svensson, M. (2005). Review of Human Rights Capacity Building Programme in China 2001-2003. Report for Swedish International Development Agency, Stockholm.
Clapham, A. (1999). Where Is the EU’s Human Rights Common Foreign Policy? In P. Alston (Ed.), The EU and Human Rights (pp. 627-683) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eglin, M. (1997). China’s Entry into the WTO with a Little Help from the EU. International Affairs, 73 (3), 489-508.
European Commission (1995) A Long-Term Policy for China-Europe Relations, Commission Communication No. 279, Brussels.
European Commission (1998) Building a Comprehensive Partnership with China, Commission Communication No. 181, Brussels.
European Commission (2003) A Maturing Partnership – Shared Interests and Challenges in EU-China Relations, Commission Communication No. 533, Brussels.
European Commission (2006) EU – China: Closer partners, growing responsibilities, Commission Communication No. 631, Brussels.
European Commission (2007) Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation and Partnership with the People’s Republic of China, Country Level Evaluation. Synthesis Report, 2nd Draft Final, retrieved on 15 July 2009, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/51/37274405.pdf.
European Council (2006) User’s Guide to the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports. PESC 18, COARM 1, Brussels.
Foradori, P., Rosa, P., Scartezzini R. (Eds.). (2007). Managing a Multilevel Foreign Policy. The EU in International Affairs. London: Routledge.
Fox, J. and Godement, F. (2009), A Power Audit of EU-China Relations. Policy Report, European Council on Foreign Relations, retrieved on 15 July 2009, http://ecfr.3cdn.net/532cd91d0b5c9699ad_ozm6b9bz4.pdf.
Hill, C. and Wallace W. (1996). Introduction: Actors and Actions. In C. Hill (Ed.), The Actors in Europe’s Foreign Policy (pp. 1-16). London: Routledge.
House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Select Committee (2000). UK Relations with China. London: HMSO
Hyde Price, A. (2004). Interests, Institutions and Identities in the Study of European Foreign Policy. In B. Tonra & T. Christiansen (Eds.), Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy (pp. 99-113). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lucarelli, S. and Manners, I. (Eds.). (2006). Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: a Contradiction in Terms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (2), 235-58.CrossRef
Möller, K. (2002). Diplomatic Relations and Mutual Strategic Perceptions: China and the European Union. The China Quarterly, 169, 10-32.CrossRef
Schulte Kulkmann, N. (2005). The German-Chinese “Rule of Law Dialogue”. In M. Overhaus, H. W. Maull and S. Harnisch (eds.), German Chinese Relations: Trade Promotion Plus Something Else? (pp. 1-8) German Foreign Policy in Dialogue, 6 (16).
Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Collective Identity. In W. Carlsnaes et al. (Eds.), Contemporary European Foreign Policy (pp. 122-139), London: Sage Publication.
Smith, K. (2003). European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Smith, K. (2006). Speaking with One Voice? European Union Co-ordination on Human Rights Issues at the United Nations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), 113-137.CrossRef
Smith, M. E. (2004). Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation. European Journal of International Relations, 10 (1), 95-136.CrossRef
Tocci, N. (2008). Profiling Normative Foreign Policy. In N. Tocci (Ed.), Who Is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The EU and its Global Partners. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.
White, B. (2001). Understanding European Foreign Policy, New York: Palgrave.
Woodman, S. (2004). Bilateral Aid to Improve Human Rights. Donors need to adopt a more coherent and thoughtful strategy, China Perspectives, 51
Youngs, R. (2004). Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 2, 415-435.CrossRef
Youngs, R. (Ed.) (2006). Survey of European Democracy Promotion Policies 2000-2006, FRIDE, Madrid.
- The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China
Volume 27, Issue 1 , pp 35-55
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. College of Europe, Dijver 11, 8000, Bruges, Belgium