Acta Analytica

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 95–109

Infinite Regress Arguments

Authors

    • Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Department of Philosophy and Moral ScienceGhent University
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12136-012-0165-1

Cite this article as:
Wieland, J.W. Acta Anal (2013) 28: 95. doi:10.1007/s12136-012-0165-1

Abstract

Infinite regress arguments play an important role in many distinct philosophical debates. Yet, exactly how they are to be used to demonstrate anything is a matter of serious controversy. In this paper I take up this metaphilosophical debate, and demonstrate how infinite regress arguments can be used for two different purposes: either they can refute a universally quantified proposition (as the Paradox Theory says), or they can demonstrate that a solution never solves a given problem (as the Failure Theory says). In the meantime, I show that Black’s view on infinite regress arguments (1996, this journal) is incomplete, and how his criticism of Passmore can be countered.

Keywords

InfiniteRegressArgumentSchemaParadoxFailure

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012