Abbott, B. (2006). Where have some of the presuppositions gone? In B. Birner and G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 1–30). John Benjamins.
Abusch, D. (2002). Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII (pp. 1–20). CLC Publications.
Atlas, J. D. (2004). Presupposition. In L.R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 29–52). Blackwell.
BonJour, L. (2002). Epistemology: Classic problems and contemporary responses. Rowman & Littlefield.
Buckwalter, W. (ms), Factive verbs and protagonist projection.
Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford University Press.
DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism. Oxford University Press.
Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Prentice-Hall.
Frege, G. (1892). On Sense and Reference. In Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (1970) (pp. 56–78). Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. (1919). Negation. In Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (1970) (pp. 117–35). Oxford University Press.
Fumerton, R. (2006). Epistemology. Blackwell.
Glanzberg, M. (2005). Presupposition, truth values, and expressing propositions. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, truth, and meaning (pp. 349–96). Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. (2002). Pathways to knowledge: Private and public. Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. (2010). Achieving knowledge: A virtue-theoretic account of epistemic normativity. Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
Hannon, M. (forthcoming). ‘Knows’ entails truth. Journal of Philosophical Research.
Hazlett, A. (2009). Knowledge and conversation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78
(3), 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, A. (2010). The myth of factive verbs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80
(3), 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, R. (1997). Some telling examples: a reply to Tsohatzidis. Journal of Pragmatics, 28
, 625–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, R. (ms). Facts, factives, and contra-factives.
Karttunen, L. (1971). Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics, 5
, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L., & Peters, L. (1979). Conventional implicature. In C. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition (pp. 1–56). Academic Press.
Katz, J. (1979). A solution to the projection problem for presupposition. In C. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition (pp. 91–126). Academic Press.
Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1971). Fact. In D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology (pp. 345–69). Cambridge University Press.
Kusch, M. (2009). Testimony and the value of knowledge. In A. Haddock, A. Milar, and D. Pitchard (Eds.), Epistemic value (pp. 60–94). Oxford University Press.
Moore, G. E. (1993). Moore’s Paradox. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), Selected Writings (pp. 207–212). Routledge.
Simons, M. (2001). On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, and Z. Zvolensky (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistics theory 11 (pp. 431–48). CLC Publications.
Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, Volume 1. Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (1999). Pragmatic presuppositions. In his Context and content (pp. 45–62). Oxford University Press.
Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59
, 230–44.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. Methuen.
Tsohatzidis, S. (2012). How to forget that “know” is factive. Acta Analytica
Turri, J. (2011). Mythology of the factive. Logos & Episteme, 2
(1), 143–52.Google Scholar
van Fraasen, B. C. (1971). Formal semantics and logic. Macmillan.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press.
Weiner, M. (2006). Are all conversational implicatures cancellable? Analysis, 66
(2), 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar