Acta Analytica

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 329–341

Dissociative Identity: An Objection to Baker’s Constitution Theory

Authors

    • San Diego State University
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12136-011-0133-1

Cite this article as:
Greetis, E.A. Acta Anal (2011) 26: 329. doi:10.1007/s12136-011-0133-1

Abstract

One of the central problems of personal identity is to determine what we are essentially. In response to this problem, Lynne Rudder Baker espouses a psychological criterion, that is, she claims that persons are essentially psychological. Baker’s theory purports to bypass the problems of other psychological theories such as Dissociative Identity Disorder and the problem of individuating persons synchronically. I argue that the theory’s treatment of Dissociative Identity Disorder leads to untenable results, is invalid, and consequently fails to individuate persons.

Keywords

Lynne rudder bakerPersonal identityDissociative identity disorderMaterial constitution

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011