Functionalism about Truth and the Metaphysics of Reduction
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Functionalism about truth is the view that truth is an explanatorily significant but multiply-realizable property. According to this view the properties that realize truth vary from domain to domain, but the property of truth is a single, higher-order, domain insensitive property. We argue that this view faces a challenge similar to the one that Jaegwon Kim laid out for the multiple realization thesis. The challenge is that the higher-order property of truth is equivalent to an explanatorily idle disjunction of its realization bases. This consequence undermines the alethic functionalists’ non-deflationary ambitions. A plausible response to Kim’s argument fails to carry over to alethic functionalism on account of significant differences between alethic functionalism and psychological functionalism. Lynch’s revised view in his book Truth as One and Many (2009) fails to answer our challenge. The upshot is that, while mental functionalism may survive Kim’s argument, it mortally wounds functionalism about truth.
- Antony, L. (2003). Who’s afraid of disjunctive properties? Philosophical Issues, 13, 1–21. CrossRef
- Antony, L., & Levine, J. (1997). Reduction with autonomy. Nous 31, Supplement: Philosophical perspectives, 11, Mind, causation, and world, 88–105.
- Clapp, L. (2001). Disjunctive properties: multiple realizations. Journal of Philosophy, 98(3), 111–136. CrossRef
- Davidson, D. (2001). The folly of trying to define truth. In M. Lynch (Ed.), The nature of truth (pp. 623–640). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Field, H. (1986). The deflationary conception of truth. In G. Macdonald & C. Wright (Eds.), Fact, science, and morality: Essays on A. J. Ayer’s language, truth, and logic (pp. 483–503). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Fodor, J. (1997). Special sciences: still autonomous after all these years. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 149–163.
- Horwich, P. (1998). Truth (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Kim, J. (1992). Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LII(1), 1–26. CrossRef
- Lewis, D. (1970). How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy, 67(13), 427–446. CrossRef
- Lewis, D. (1972). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 249–258. CrossRef
- Lynch, M. (2001). A functionalist theory of truth. In M. Lynch (Ed.), The nature of truth (pp. 723–749). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Lynch, M. (2004). Truth and multiple realizability. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82(3), 384–408. CrossRef
- Lynch, M. (2005). Alethic functionalism and our folk theory of truth. Synthese, 145, 29–43. CrossRef
- Lynch, M. (2008). Alethic pluralism, logical consequence and the universality of reason. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXXII, 122–140. CrossRef
- Lynch, M. (2009). Truth as one and many. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Wright, C. (1992). Truth & objectivity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Wright, C. (2005). On the functionalization of pluralist approaches to truth. Synthese, 145, 1–28. CrossRef
- Yablo, S. (1992). Mental causation. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 245–280. CrossRef
- Yablo, S. (1995). Singling out properties. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 477–502. CrossRef
- Functionalism about Truth and the Metaphysics of Reduction
Volume 27, Issue 1 , pp 13-27
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links