Acta Analytica

, 24:249

Perception and Virtue Reliabilism

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12136-009-0064-2

Cite this article as:
Lyons, J.C. Acta Anal (2009) 24: 249. doi:10.1007/s12136-009-0064-2

Abstract

In some recent work, Ernest Sosa rejects the “perceptual model” of rational intuition, according to which intuitive beliefs (e.g., that \( 2 + 2 = 4 \)) are justified by standing in the appropriate relation to a nondoxastic intellectual experience (a seeming-true, or the like), in much the way that perceptual beliefs are often held to be justified by an appropriate relation to nondoxastic sense experiential states. By extending some of Sosa’s arguments and adding a few of my own, I argue that Sosa is right to reject the perceptual model of intuition, and that we should reject the “perceptual model” of perception as well. Rational intuition and perception should both receive a virtue theoretic (e.g., reliabilist) account, rather than an evidentialist one. To this end, I explicitly argue against the Grounds Principle, which holds that all justified beliefs must be based on some adequate reason, or ground.

Keywords

EpistemologyReliabilismEvidentialismPerceptionExperienceGrounds

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA