A Deflationary Metaphysics of Morality
- Fritz J. McDonald
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The metaphysical dispute between moral realists and antirealists is cast in terms of properties: the realist holds that moral properties exist, the antirealist denies this claim. There is a longstanding philosophical dispute over the nature of properties, and the obscurity of properties may make the realist/antirealist dispute even more obscure. In the spirit of deflationary theories of truth, we can turn to a deflationary theory of properties in order to clarify this issue. One might reasonably worry that such an account of properties would not be capable of properly characterizing disputes regarding the existence or nonexistence of genuine moral properties. In this paper, I will show that, within this framework, the traditional disputes over the existence of moral properties can be characterized in a far clearer fashion than is usually the case. A deflationary account of properties, along with an explanatory hierarchy of properties, makes the dispute in ontology clear.
- Blackburn, S. (1988). How to be an ethical anti-realist. In S. Darwall, A. Gibbard & P. Railton (Eds.), Moral discourse and practice: Some philosophical approaches (1997) (pp. 167–178). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Blackburn, S. (1999). Is objectively moral justification possible on a quasi-realist foundation? Inquiry, 42(2), 213–228. CrossRef
- Chrisman, M. (2008). Expressivism, inferentialism, and saving the debate. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77(2), 334–358. CrossRef
- Dreier, J. (2004). Meta-ethics and the problem of creeping minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1), 23–44.
- Dreier, J. (2006). “Was Moore a Moorean?”. In T. Horgan & M. Timmons (Eds.), Metaethics after Moore (pp. 191–208). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Fine, K. (2001). The question of realism. Philosopher's Imprint, I(2), 1–30.
- Gibbard, A. (2003). Thinking how to live. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Hardin, C. L. (1988). Color for philosophers: Unweaving the Rainbow. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett.
- Harman, G. (1977). The nature of morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Horwich, P. (1993). Gibbard's theory of norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(1), 67–78.
- Horwich, P. (1998). Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
- Moore, G. E. (1968). A reply to my critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of G. E. Moore (1968) (pp. 533–677). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
- O'Leary-Hawthorne, J., & Price, H. (1996). How to stand up for non-cognitivists. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(2), 275–292. CrossRef
- Schiffer, S. (2003). The things we mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Shafer-Landau, R. (2006). Ethics as philosophy: A defense of ethical nonnaturalism. In R. Shafer-Landau & T. Cuneo (Eds.), Foundations of ethics (2007) (pp. 210–221). Malden, Ma.: Blackwell Publishing.
- Sturgeon, N. (1985). Moral explanations. In R. Shafer-Landau & T. Cuneo (Eds.), Foundations of ethics (2007) (pp. 337–352). Melden, Ma.: Blackwell Publishing.
- Sturgeon, N. (2006). Moral explanations defended. In J. Dreier (Ed.), Contemporary debates in moral theory (pp. 241–262). Melden, Ma.: Blackwell Publishing.
- A Deflationary Metaphysics of Morality
Volume 25, Issue 3 , pp 285-298
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Oakland University, Philosophy, 340 O’Dowd Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309-4401, USA