A Critique of Armstrong’s Truthmaking Account of Possibility
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Kalhat, J. Acta Anal (2008) 23: 161. doi:10.1007/s12136-008-0027-z
- 64 Downloads
In this paper I argue against Armstrong’s recent truthmaking account of possibility. I show that the truthmaking account presupposes modality in a number of different ways, and consequently that it is incapable of underwriting a genuine reduction of modality. I also argue that Armstrong’s account faces serious difficulties irrespective of the question of reduction; in particular, I argue that his Entailment and Possibility Principles are both false.