Dancy Cartwright: Particularism in the philosophy of science
- Constantine Sandis
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper aims to explore the space of possible particularistic approaches to Philosophy of Science by examining the differences and similarities between Jonathan Dancy’s moral particularism—as expressed in both his earlier writings (e.g., Moral Reasons, 1993), and, more explicitly defended in his book Ethics without Principles (2004)—and Nancy Cartwright’s particularism in the philosophy of science, as defended in her early collection of essays, How the Laws of Physics Lie (1983), and her later book, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (1999). I shall argue that Dancy’s particularism is more radical, but also more plausible, than Cartwright’s, concluding that we have good reason to embrace a scientific particularism that is far closer to Dancy’s ethical particularism than any view defended by Nancy Cartwright, or any other philosopher from the ‘Stanford school’ of scientific theory.
- Achinstein, P. (1983), The Nature of Explanation, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Aristotle (1953), Nichomanchean Ethics, translation J.A.K. Thomson, (London: Penguin).
- Arrington, R. (2002), ‘A Wittgensteinian Approach to Ethical Intuitionism’, in Stratton-Lake (2002), Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 271–289.
- Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
- —— (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- Dancy, J. (1993), Moral Reasons, (Oxford: Blackwell).
- —— (2000), Practical Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- —— (2004), Ethics Without Principles, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Dupré, J. (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
- Hooker, B., & Little, M. (eds.) (2000), Moral Particularism, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Lance, M., & Little, M. (forthcoming), ‘Where the Laws Are’.
- Little, M. (2000), ‘Moral Generalities Revisited’ in Hooker and Little 2000: 276–304.
- Ross, W.D. (1930), The Right and the Good, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Dancy Cartwright: Particularism in the philosophy of science
Volume 21, Issue 2 , pp 30-40
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- philosophy of science
- moral reasons
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Oxford Brookes University, Harcourt Hill Campus, OX2 9AT, Oxford, UK