Why so Serious? Non-serious Presentism and the Problem of Cross-temporal Relations
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Inman, R. Int Ontology Metaphysics (2012) 13: 55. doi:10.1007/s12133-012-0093-y
It is a common assumption in the metaphysics of time that a commitment to presentism entails a commitment to serious presentism, the view that objects can exemplify properties or stand in relations only at times at which they exist. As a result, non-serious presentism is widely thought to be beyond the bounds for the card-carrying presentist in response to the problem of cross-temporal relations. In this paper, I challenge this general consensus by examining one common argument in favor of the thesis that presentism entails serious presentism. The argument, I claim, begs the question against non-serious defenders in failing to account for their wider metaontological views concerning non-committal quantification.