Metaphysica

, 12:117

Lewis’ Modal Realism and Absence Causation

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12133-011-0080-8

Cite this article as:
Baltimore, J.A. Int Ontology Metaphysics (2011) 12: 117. doi:10.1007/s12133-011-0080-8
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

A major criticism of David Lewis’ counterfactual theory of causation is that it allows too many things to count as causes, especially since Lewis allows, in addition to events, absences to be causes as well. Peter Menzies has advanced this concern under the title “the problem of profligate causation.” In this paper, I argue that the problem of profligate causation provides resources for exposing a tension between Lewis’ acceptance of absence causation and his modal realism. The result is a different problem of profligate causation—one that attacks the internal consistency of Lewisian metaphysics rather than employing common sense judgments or intuitions that conflict with Lewis’ extensive list of causes.

Keywords

David LewisCounterfactual theory of causationAbsence causationModal realism

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA