Theories and Theories of Truth
- Ryan Christensen
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Formal theories, as in logic and mathematics, are sets of sentences closed under logical consequence. Philosophical theories, like scientific theories, are often far less formal. There are many axiomatic theories of the truth predicate for certain formal languages; on analogy with these, some philosophers (most notably Paul Horwich) have proposed axiomatic theories of the property of truth. Though in many ways similar to logical theories, axiomatic theories of truth must be different in several nontrivial ways. I explore what an axiomatic theory of truth would look like. Because Horwich’s is the most prominent, I examine his theory and argue that it fails as a theory of truth. Such a theory is adequate if, given a suitable base theory, every fact about truth is a consequence of the axioms of the theory. I show, using an argument analogous to Gödel’s incompleteness proofs, that no axiomatic theory of truth could ever be adequate. I also argue that a certain class of generalizations cannot be consequences of the theory.
- Christensen, R. McGee on Horwich. In press
- David, M. (2002) Minimalism and the Facts about Truth. In: R. Schantz, ed. What is Truth? New York: Walter de Gruyter.
- Davidson, D. (1996) The Folly of Trying to Define Truth. Journal of Philosophy 93: 263–278. CrossRef
- Grim, P. (1991) The Incomplete Universe: Totality, Knowledge, and Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Gupta, A. (1993) Minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives 7:359–69. CrossRef
- Halbach, V. (1999) Disquotationalism and Infinite Conjunctions. Mind 108:1–22. CrossRef
- Halbach, V., and Horsten, L. (2002) Contemporary Methods for Investigating the Concept of Truth—An Introduction. In: Halbach and Horsten, eds. Principles of Truth. Fankfurt: Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen: 11–36.
- Heck, R. (1997) Tarski, Truth, and Semantics. The Philosophical Review 106: 533–54. CrossRef
- Horwich, P. (1990) Truth, 1st edition. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
- Horwich, P. (1998a) Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Horwich, P. (1998b) Truth, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Horwich, P. (1999) Davidson on Deflationism. In: Discussions with Donald Davidson: On Truth, Meaning, and Knowledge, edited by U. Zeglen, London, Routledge, 1999.
- Horwich, P. (2002) A Defense of Minimalism. In Halbach and Horsten.
- Horwich, P. (2006a) Reflections on Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Horwich, P. (2006b) The Value of Truth. Noûs 40: 347–360. CrossRef
- McGee, V. (1992). “Maximal Consistent Sets of Instances of Tarski’s Schema (T).” Journal of Philosophical Logic 21: 235–41. CrossRef
- Kirkham, R. (1992) Theories of Truth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Raatikainen, P. (2005) On Horwich’s Way Out. Analysis 65: 175–77. CrossRef
- Soames, S. (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford: University Press. CrossRef
- Tarski, A. (1983) The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Theories and Theories of Truth
Volume 12, Issue 1 , pp 31-43
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Ryan Christensen (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Brigham Young University, 4085 JFSB, Provo, UT, 84602, USA