The Case of Online Trust
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper contributes to the debate on online trust addressing the problem of whether an online environment satisfies the necessary conditions for the emergence of trust. The paper defends the thesis that online environments can foster trust, and it does so in three steps. Firstly, the arguments proposed by the detractors of online trust are presented and analysed. Secondly, it is argued that trust can emerge in uncertain and risky environments and that it is possible to trust online identities when they are diachronic and sufficient data are available to assess their reputation. Finally, a definition of trust as a second-order property of first-order relation is endorsed in order to present a new definition of online trust. According to such a definition, online trust is an occurrence of trust that specifically qualifies the relation of communication ongoing among individuals in digital environments. On the basis of this analysis, the paper concludes by arguing that online trust promotes the emergence of social behaviours rewarding honest and transparent communications.
- Baker, C. R. (2002). Crime, fraud and deceit on the internet: is there hyperreality in cyberspace? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(1), 1–15. CrossRef
- Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–242.
- Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J. et al. (1996). Decentralized Trust Management. In: 17th Symposium on Security and Privacy, Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Computer Society Press.
- Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., et al. (2003). On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737–758. CrossRef
- de Vries, P. (2006). In W. Isselsteijn, Y. de Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Social presence as a conduit to the social dimensions of online trust persuasive technology (pp. 55–59). Berlin: Springer.
- Demolombe, R. (2004). Reasoning about trust: A formal logic framework. Berlin: Springer.
- eBizMBA (2010). “Top 20 Most Popular Social Networking Websitess, May 2010.” Available at: http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites. Accessed 16 Sept 2010
- Ess, C. M. (forthcoming). “Trust and New Communication Technologies: Vicious Circles, Virtuous Circles, Possible Futures.” Knoweldge, Technology and Policy.
- Floridi, L. (2010). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gambetta, D. (1998). Can We Trust Trust? Trust: making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Trust: making and Breaking Cooperative Relations D. Gambetta (pp. 213–238). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Hume, D. (1992). In L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Johnson, D. G. (1997). Ethics online, shaping social behavior online takes more than new laws and modified edicts. Communication of the ACM, 40(1), 60–65. CrossRef
- Kollock, P. (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 313–345. CrossRef
- Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.
- McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35–59.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2001). Securing Trust Online: Wisdom or Oxymoron. Boston University Law Review, 81(3), 635–664.
- Nwana H, Rosenschein J et al. (1998). Agent-mediated electronic commerce: Issues, challenges and some viewpoints. Autonomous Agents 98. ACM Press, New York.
- Oreilly, T. (2007). “What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Communications & Strategies 1(First Quarter): 17.
- Papadopoulou, P. (2007). Applying virtual reality for trust-building e-commerce environments. Virtual Reality, 11(2–3), 107–127. CrossRef
- Pettit, P. (1995). The Cunning of Trust. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(3), 202–225. CrossRef
- Ranjit, N. (2007). Multiagent Referral Systems: Maintaining and Applying Trust and Expertise Mode. Computer Science, North Carolina State University. Master of Science.
- Seigman, A. B. (2000). The problem of trust princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Taddeo, M. (2009). Defining trust and e-trust: old theories and new problems. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 5(2), 23–35.
- Taddeo, M. (2010). Modelling trust in artificial agents, a first step toward the analysis of e-Trust. Minds and Machines, 20(2), 243–257. CrossRef
- Tuomela, M., & Hofmann, S. (2003). Simulating rational social normative trust, predictive trust, and predictive reliance between agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(3), 163–176. CrossRef
- Weckert, J. (2005). Trust in Cyberspace. The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives. R. J. Cavalier (pp. 95–120). Albany: University of New York Press.
- Yamagishi, T., & Kikuchi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 145–161. CrossRef
- The Case of Online Trust
Knowledge, Technology & Policy
Volume 23, Issue 3-4 , pp 333-345
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 2. IESE Business School, Barcelona, Madrid, Spain
- 3. Department of Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK
- 4. Uehiro Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK