Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying the Disruptive Innovation Framework to the Silver Market

Technology Adoption and Deployment for Older Consumers

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the increased attention that the topic of aging and technology is receiving from academia, policy and business practice, both conceptual and empirical research in this area is still scarce. Particularly, there seems to be a dearth of applications of well-grounded and established frameworks from the field of innovation and technology management to the case of older consumers and the “silver market.” Through an approach that combines conceptual development with explorative empirical research using the disruptive innovation framework, we find that: 1) the silver market is an excellent field of application for low-end disruptions as elderly customers will increasingly demand just-good-enough performance—easy and safe to use—and affordable products and services; 2) the silver market is an excellent field of application for new market disruptions as elderly customers will increasingly demand new products and services they had not demanded or had not been able to demand before; 3) transgenerational and ageless products and services are an excellent field of application for disruptive innovations; 4) disruptive innovations for the silver market are particularly effective and easy to adopt and use due to their good-enough functionality and performance (including ease of use) and affordability, and this helps to increase their diffusion among older consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R. (2002). When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 667–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, B., & Schiffman, L. G. (1981). Cognitive age: A nonchronological variable. In K. B. Monroe (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 8, pp. 602–606). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., & Silverstein, M. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Theories of Aging (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröring, S., Cloutier, L. M., & Leker, J. (2006). The front end of innovation in an era of industry convergence: evidence from nutraceuticals and functional foods. R&D Management, 36(5), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. C., & Kwon, S. (Eds.). (2004). Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). New challenges for R&D management. In European Institute for Technology and Innovation Management (Ed.), Bringing technology and innovation into the boardroom: Strategy, innovation and competences for business value (pp. 269–291). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth, E. A. (2004). Seeing what's next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulmas, F., Conrad, H., Schad-Seifert, A., & Vogt, G. (Eds.). (2008). The demographic challenge: A handbook about Japan. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 29(3), 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., Guerrier, J. H., Nair, S. N., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). Computer communication as an aid to independence for older adults. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12(4), 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., & Schulz, R. (2006). Innovations in technology and aging: Introduction. Generations, 30(2), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998). Age differences in attitudes toward computers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological sciences, 53B(5), 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. New York: Truman Talley Books, St. Martin's Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druehl, C. T., & Schmidt, G. M. (2008). A strategy for opening a new market and encroaching on the lower end of the existing market. Production and Operations Management, 17(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. K. (1999). The elderly at the millennium: courting the older consumer. Ageing International, 25(1), 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, M. C., & Zeithaml, V. (1985). The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, L. N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19(1), 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006a). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006b). The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K., & Martin, M. J. C. (2005). Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chaing: a framework for evaluating radical technology development. R&D Management, 35(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (2005). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspektive. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., & Kobylanski, A. (2009). Increasing elder consumer interactions with information technology. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüsig, S., Hipp, C., & Dowling, M. (2005). Analysing disruptive potential: the case of wireless local area network and mobile communications network companies. R&D Management, 35(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irie, T., Matsunaga, K., & Nagano, Y. (2005). Universal design activities for mobile phone: Raku Raku PHONE. Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, 41(1), 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamoto, H., & Sankai, Y. (2005). Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Advanced Robotics, 19(7), 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, J. M., Kart, C. S., Murdoch, L. D., & Ziemba, T. F. (2003). Challenges in caregiving and creative solutions: using technology to facilitate caring for a relative with dementia. Ageing International, 28(3), 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlbacher, F., & Hang, CC (2007). Disruptive innovations and the graying market. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 1915–1919), Singapore.

  • Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (2009). "Silver Products" development: The reality of R&D in firms in Japan. Paper presented at the The R&D Management Conference 2009, Vienna, Austria.

  • Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (Eds.). (2008). The silver market phenomenon: Business opportunities in an era of demographic change. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlbacher, F., & Hideg, A. (2010). Raku-Raku Phone: Einfach telefonieren—einfach erfolgreich. JapanMarkt, May 2010, 22–25.

  • Lai, O.-K. (2008). The enigma of Japanese ageing-in-place practice in the information age: Does digital gadget help the (good) practice for inter-generation care? Ageing International, 32(3), 236–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. (1984). Changing demographics: stimulus for new product ideas. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1(2), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levkoff, S. E. (2000). Graying of Japan: Choju shakai. Ageing International, 26(1–2), 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, D. A., & Burnett, M. S. (1992). Marketing product innovations to the elderly: understanding the barriers to adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, G. (2009). The age of aging: How demographics are changing the global economy and our world. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C. (Ed.). (2005). Smart technology for aging, disability, and independence: The state of the science. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: in need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, A. (1999). Adoption of technological innovations by the elderly: a consumer socialization perspective. The Journal of Marketing Management, 9(3), 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMellon, C. A., & Schiffman, L. G. (2002). Cybersenior empowerment: how some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Moore, K. (2008). Can the internet improve the well-being of the elderly? Ageing International, 32(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, H. R. (2002). Aging: Concepts and controversies (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P. (1996). Gerontographics: Life-stage segmentation for marketing strategy development. Westport: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P. (2007). Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mynatt, E. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2001). Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing International, 27(1), 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä-Nyrhinen, J. (2007). Baby boom consumers and technology: shooting down stereotypes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(5), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, L. W., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Age differences in information processing: a perspective on the aged consumer. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirkl, J. J. (1994). Transgenerational design: Products for an aging population. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. L. (2010). The power of global aging. Ageing International, 35(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B. (1995). Technology and aging: a separate little world? Ageing International, 22(1), 54–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: usual and successful. Science, 237(4811), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Succesful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. M. (2004). Low-end and high-end encroachment strategies for new products. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(2), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2005). Changes in product attributes and costs as drivers of new product diffusion and substitution. Production and Operations Management, 14(3), 272–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury, L., & Simcock, P. (2009). Understanding older consumers through cognitive age and the list of values: a U.K.-based perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 26(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, K., Mito, G., Kawamoto, H., Hasegawa, Y., & Sankai, Y. (2007). Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patients with robort suit HAL. Advanced Robotics, 21(12), 1441–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempest, S., Barnat, C., & Coupland, C. (2002). Grey advantage: new strategies for the old. Long Range Planning, 35(5), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (1996). Computer technology: how it impacts the lives of older adults. Ageing International, 23(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tielen, G. (1998). Integrating senior citizens into the information society. Ageing International, 24(2–3), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuno, N., & Homma, A. (2009). Ageing in Asia—the Japan experience. Ageing International, 34(1–2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, K., Andrus, R., & Poulsen, L. (1970). How are laggards different? An empirical inquiry. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., & Acee, H. J. (2005). Disruptive technologies: an expanded view. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S. (2008). Robot therapy of elders affected by dementia. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 27(4), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. B., & Snyder, R. E. (2003). Ageless marketing: Strategies for reaching the hearts & minds of the new customer majority. Chicago: Dearborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylde, M. A. (1995). How to size up the current and future markets: technologies and the older adult. Generations, 19(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003a). Applications of case study research (2nd ed., Vol. 34)). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003b). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed., Vol. 5)). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2009). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V., & Gilly, M. C. (1987). Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: a comparison of elderly and nonelderly consumers. Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Professor C.C. Hang is a non-executive director of Ampere Vehicles Pte Ltd in Singapore; this company has designed and manufactured e-bikes for the Indian market. One segment of the market is the aged or handicapped customers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Kohlbacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohlbacher, F., Hang, C.C. Applying the Disruptive Innovation Framework to the Silver Market. Ageing Int 36, 82–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9076-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9076-x

Keywords

Navigation