A Neo-Meadian Approach to Human Agency: Relating the Social and the Psychological in the Ontogenesis of Perspective-Coordinating Persons
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
How can human agency be reconciled with bio-physical determinism? Starting with a discussion of the long standing debate between determinism and agency, we argue that the seeds of a reconciliation can be found in George Herbert Mead’s ideas concerning social acts, perspectives, differentiation, self-other interactivity, and conscious understanding. Drawing on more recent reformulations of Mead’s ideas, we present an integrated account of the ontogenesis of human agency. Human agency, we argue, should be conceptualized in terms of distanciation from immediate experience, and we show how social interactions, institutions and symbolic resources foster the development of agency in increasingly complex ways. We conclude by situating our work in relation to other developmental accounts and the larger project of theorizing and empirically supporting a compatibilist rendering of human agency as the “determined” self-determination of persons.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Anisfeld, M. (1996). Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review, 16, 149–161. CrossRef
- Barresi, J. (1999). On becoming a person. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 79–98. CrossRef
- Barresi, J. (2010). On seeing ourselves and others as persons. In J. Martin & M. H. Bickhard (Eds.), The new psychology of personhood [Special Issue]. New Ideas in Psychology, 28.
- Bickhard, M. H. (2004). The social ontology of persons. In J. I. M. Carpendale & U. Muller (Eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge (pp. 111–132). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Bickhard, M. H. (2008). Are you social? The ontological and developmental emergence of the person. In U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, N. Budwig, & B. Sokol (Eds.), Social life and social knowledge (pp. 17–42). New York: Taylor & Francis.
- Bickhard, M. H. (2010). A process ontology of persons and their development. In J. Martin & M. H. Bickhard (Eds.), The new psychology of personhood [Special Issue]. New Ideas in Psychology, 28.
- Bigelow, A. E. (1999). Infants’ sensitivity to imperfect contingency in social interaction. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 137–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Carpendale, J., & Lewis, C. (2006). How children develop social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Christopher, J. C., & Bickhard, M. H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Culture Psychology, 13, 259–295. CrossRef
- Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York: Viking.
- Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.
- Falmagne, R. J. (2004). On the constitution of ‘self’ and ‘mind. Theory & Psychology, 14, 822–845. CrossRef
- Frie, R. (1997). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.
- Gillespie, A. (2005). G. H. Mead: Theorist of the social act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35, 19–39. CrossRef
- Gillespie, A. (2006a). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49, 87–92. CrossRef
- Gillespie, A. (2006b). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
- Gillespie, A. (2009). The intersubjective nature of symbols. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformations. London: Routledge.
- Gillespie, A. (2010). Position exchange: the social development of agency. New Ideas in Psychology.
- Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using resources: conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture & Psychology.
- Harré, R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.
- Hobson, P. (2002). The cradle of thought: Exploring the origins of thinking. London: Macmillan.
- Martin, J. (2003). Emergent persons. New Ideas in Psychology, 21, 85–99. CrossRef
- Martin, J. (2005). Perspectival selves in interaction with others: re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35, 231–253. CrossRef
- Martin, J. (2006). Re-interpreting internalization and agency through G. H. Mead’s perspectival realism. Human Development, 49, 65–86. CrossRef
- Martin, J. (2007). Interpreting and extending G. H. Mead’s ‘metaphysics’ of selfhood and agency. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 441–456. CrossRef
- Martin, J. (2008). Perspectives and persons: Ontological, constitutive possibilities. In U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, N. Budwig, & B. Sokol (Eds.), Social life and social knowledge: Toward a process account of development (pp. 43–63). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Martin, J. (2010). Coordinating with others: Outlining a pragmatic, perspectival psychology of personhood. In J. Martin & M. H. Bickhard (Eds.), The new psychology of personhood [Special Issue]. New Ideas in Psychology, 28.
- Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany: SUNY.
- Martin, J., Sokol, B., & Elfers, T. (2008). Taking and coordinating perspectives: from pre-reflective interactivity, through reflective intersubjectivity, to meta-reflective sociality. Human Development, 51, 294–317. CrossRef
- Martin, J., Sugarman, J. H., & Hickinbottom, S. (2010). Persons: Understanding psychological selfhood and agency. New York: Springer. CrossRef
- Mead, G. H. (1903). The definition of the psychical. Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago (pp. 77–112). Chicago: University of Chicago.
- Mead, G. H. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy, 19, 157–163. CrossRef
- Mead, G. H. (1927). The objective reality of perspectives. In E. S. Brightman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green.
- Mead, G. H. (1932). In A. E. Murphy (Ed.), The philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self, & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Mead, G. H. (1938). In C. W. Morris et al. (Eds.), The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Mead, G. H. (1977). In A. Stauss (Ed.), George Herbert Mead on social psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Rochat, P., & Hespos, S. J. (1997). Differential rooting response by neonates: evidence for an early sense of self. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 105–112. CrossRef
- Rochat, P., & Strianno, T. (2002). Who’s in the mirror? Self-other discrimination in specular images by four- and nine-month-old infants. Child Development, 73, 35–46. CrossRef
- Russell, J. (1996). Agency: Its role in mental development. Hove: Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
- Russell, J. (1999). Cognitive development as an executive process—in part: a homeopathic dose of Piaget. Developmental Science, 2, 247–295. CrossRef
- Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge: MIT.
- Searle, J. R. (2007). Freedom & neurobiology: Reflections on free will, language, and political power. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Selman, R. L. (1973, March). A structural analysis of the ability to take another’s social perspective: Stages in the development of role-taking ability. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research and Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.
- Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic.
- Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 14, 475–503. CrossRef
- Tarski, A. (1944). The semantical concept of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 13–47. CrossRef
- Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
- Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT.
- Trevarthen, C. (1982). The primary motives for cooperative understanding. In G. Butterworth & P. Light (Eds.), Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding (pp. 77–109). Brighton: Harvester.
- Trevarthen, C. (1992). An infant’s motives for speaking and thinking in culture. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Toward a theory of language and mind (pp. 99–137). Toronto: Scandanavian University Press.
- Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. London: Sage.
- Vessey, D. (1998, March). On the incompleteness of George Herbert Mead’s theory of the social self as an account of intersubjectivity: Re-reading Henrich after Habermas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for the Advancement of Philosophy, Milwaukee, WI.
- Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9, 415–448. CrossRef
- Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development. Human Development, 50, 208–229. CrossRef
About this Article
- A Neo-Meadian Approach to Human Agency: Relating the Social and the Psychological in the Ontogenesis of Perspective-Coordinating Persons
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
Volume 44, Issue 3 , pp 252-272
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Position exchange
- Role exchange