Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of Rational Expectations: The Role of Heterogeneity, the Monetary Footprint, and Adverse Selection in Monetary Expansion
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We contribute to the debate over the contemporary relevance of the Austrian Business Cycle theory (ABC) by making three theoretical developments. First, we claim that the heterogeneous nature of entrepreneurship is the best means to respond to a Rational Expectations (RE) critique. If entrepreneurs are different then the “cluster of errors” are not made by everyone, just those on the margin. And if the marginal entrepreneurs are systematically different from the population as a whole, we avoid the implication of widespread irrationality, even though credit expansion will affect real variables. Second, we argue that the size of the monetary footprint is a more telling signal than the market rate of interest, and will not necessarily be revealed by measured inflation. Therefore attention to the official interest rate or Consumer Price Index is misleading, and an inappropriate way to assess applicability. And third, the main harm from loose monetary policy is not that it encourages entrepreneurs to behave more recklessly with capital, but that it encourages precisely the people who can’t afford capital at the market rate to borrow, and makes them the marginal trader. This suggests that adverse selection is a more important issue than moral hazard. We acknowledge that empirical work is required to verify these claims, and suggest how this might be undertaken.
- Barnett, William II, and Walter Block. 2005. “Professor Tullock on Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Advances in Austrian Economics 8: 431–43. CrossRef
- _____. 2006. “Tyler Cowen on Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Critique.” New Perspectives on Political Economy 2(2): 26–85.
- Block, Walter. 2001. “Yes, We Have No Chaff: A Reply to Wagner’s ‘Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Saving the Wheat While Discarding the Chaff’.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4(1): 63–73. CrossRef
- Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. [1884–89] 1959. Capital and interest. 3 Vols. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press.
- Caplan, Bryan. 1997. “Why I am Not an Austrian Economist.” Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/whyaust.htm.
- Carilli, Anthony M., and Gregory M. Dempster. 2001. “Expectations in Austrian Business Cycle Theory: An Application of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Review of Austrian Economics 14(4): 319–30. CrossRef
- Cowen, Tyler. 1997. Risk and Business Cycles: New and Old Austrian Perspectives. London: Routledge.
- De Soto, Jesús Huerta. 2006. Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- Egger, John B. 1995. “Arthur Marget in the Austrian Tradition of the Theory of Money.” Review of Austrian Economics 8(2): 3–23. CrossRef
- Ferguson, Niall. 2006. “Friedman is Dead, Monetarism is Dead, But What about Inflation?” The Daily Telegraph (London) 19 November.
- Friedman, Milton. 1992. Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary History New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Garrison, Roger W. 1997. “The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.” In Business Cycles and Depressions. Ed. David Glasner. New York: Garland Publishing.
- _____. 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.
- Hayek, F.A. 1935. Prices and Production. 2nd Ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- _____. 1941. The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hummel, Jeffrey Rogers. 1979. “Problems with Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Reason Papers 5: 41–53. Available at http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/05/rp_5_4.pdf.
- Lachmann, Ludwig M.  1978. Capital and Its Structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.
- Lewin, Peter. 1999. Capital in Disequilibrium: The Role of Capital in a Changing World. New York and London: Routledge.
- Marget, Arthur W. 1937. “Inflation, Inevitable or Avoidable?” A talk presented on November 23, 1936 at the University of Minnesota. Published as No.15 in the University’s “Day and Hour Series.” University of Minnesota Press, January 1937.
- _____. 1942. The Theory of Prices: A Re-Examination of the Central problems of Monetary Theory. Vol 2. New York: Prentice-Hall.
- Mises, Ludwig von.  1971. Theory of Money and Credit. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education.
- _____.  1998. Human Action. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- Rothbard, Murray N. 1978. “Austrian Definitions of the Supply of Money.” In New Directions in Austrian Economics. Ed. Louis M. Spadaro. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
- Salerno, Joseph T. 1987. “The “True” Money Supply: A Measure of the Supply of Medium of Exchange in the U.S. Economy.” Austrian Economics Newsletter (Spring).
- Shleifer, Andrei, and Lawrence H. Summers. 1990. “The Noise Trader Approach to Finance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 19–33.
- Shostak, Frank. 1999. “Asian Recovery?” The Asian Wall Street Journal. June 15th.
- _____. 2000. “The Mystery of the Money Supply Definition.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(4): 69–76. CrossRef
- _____. 2003. “Making Sense of Money Supply Data.” Ludwig von Mises Institute Daily Article. 17th December.
- Thaler, Richard H. 1992. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economics Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- Thornton, Mark. Forthcoming. “The Economics of Housing Bubbles.” In America’s Housing Crisis: A Case of Government Failure. Ed. Benjamin Powell and Randall Holcombe. San Francisco: Independent Institute.
- Tullock, Gordon. 1987. “Why the Austrians are Wrong about Depressions.” Review of Austrian Economics 2: 73–78. CrossRef
- Wagner, Ricard E. 1994. “Economic Efficiency, Rent Seeking, and Democracy: Zenoistic Variations on Coasian Themes.” In Advances in Austrian Economics. Vol. 1. Ed. Peter Boettke and Mario J. Rizzo. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Pp. 129–44.
- _____. 1999. “Austrian Cycle Theory: Saving the Wheat while Discarding the Chaff.” Review of Austrian Economics 12(1): 105–11. CrossRef
- Wicksell, Knut.  1936. Interest and Prices. New York: Macmillan.
- Yeager, Leland B. 1986. “The Significance of Monetary Disequilibrium.” Cato Journal 6: 369–99.
- _____. 1997. The Fluttering Veil: Essays on Monetary Disequilibrium. Indianapolis, Ind: Liberty Fund.
- Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of Rational Expectations: The Role of Heterogeneity, the Monetary Footprint, and Adverse Selection in Monetary Expansion
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 81-93
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Austrian business cycle theory
- Monetary footprint
- Adverse selection