Date: 21 Feb 2012
Risk of Death or Life-Threatening Injury for Women with Children Not Sired by the Abuser
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Women who are abused by their male intimate partners incur many costs, ranging in severity from fleeting physical pain to death. Previous research has linked the presence of children sired by a woman’s previous partner to increased risk of woman abuse and to increased risk of femicide. The current research extends this work by securing data from samples of 111 unabused women, 111 less severely abused women, 128 more severely abused women, and 26 victims of intimate partner femicide from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study to document an ordinal trend in the risk of experiencing more severe forms of violence for women who have children in the household sired by a previous partner. The discussion addresses two potential explanations for this trend and highlights directions for future research.
Anderson, K. G. (2000). The life histories of American stepfathers in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 11, 307–333.CrossRef
Block, C. R. (2000a). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995–1998 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority [producer]. Ann Arbor: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Block, C. R. (2000b). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, NCJ 184511.
Block, C. R. (2000c). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995–1998: ICPSR 3002, Data collection instruments. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Brewer, V. E., & Paulsen, D. J. (1999). A comparison of U.S. and Canadian findings on uxoricide risk for women with children sired by previous partners. Homicide Studies, 3, 317–332.CrossRef
Brownridge, D. A. (2004). Male partner violence against women in stepfamilies: an analysis of risk and explanations in the Canadian milieu. Violence and Victims, 19, 17–36.CrossRef
Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.CrossRef
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.CrossRef
Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., McKeown, R. E., & King, M. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 553–559.CrossRef
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1996). Evolutionary psychology and marital conflict: The relevance of stepchildren. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.
Daly, M., Singh, L. S., & Wilson, M. (1993). Children fathered by previous partners: a risk factor for violence against women. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 209–210.
Daly, M., Wiseman, K. A., & Wilson, M. I. (1997). Women with children sired by previous partners incur excess risk of uxoricide. Homicide Studies, 1, 61–71.CrossRef
Emlen, S. T. (1997). The evolutionary study of human family systems. Social Science Information, 36, 563–589.CrossRef
Figueredo, A. J., & McCloskey, L. A. (1993). Sex, money, and paternity: the evolution of domestic violence. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 353–379.CrossRef
Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.CrossRef
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Romero, G. A., Kaighobadi, F., & Miner, E. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness, and paternity: men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 481–489.CrossRef
Heise, L. L., Raikes, A., Watts, C. H., & Zwi, A. B. (1994). Violence against women: a neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1165–1179.CrossRef
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690–700.CrossRef
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRef
Vest, J. R., Catlin, T. K., Chen, J. J., & Brownson, R. C. (2002). Multistate analysis of factor associated with intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 22, 156–164.CrossRef
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 2–7.CrossRef
- Risk of Death or Life-Threatening Injury for Women with Children Not Sired by the Abuser
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 89-97
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Domestic violence
- Intimate partner abuse
- Intimate partner homicide
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
- 2. Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA
- 3. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago, IL, USA
- 4. Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA