How Willing Are You to Accept Sexual Requests from Slightly Unattractive to Exceptionally Attractive Imagined Requestors?
- Achim SchützwohlAffiliated withDepartment of Psychology, Brunel University, West London Email author
- , Amrei FuchsAffiliated withUniversity of Bielefeld
- , William F. McKibbinAffiliated withFlorida Atlantic University
- , Todd K. ShackelfordAffiliated withFlorida Atlantic University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In their classic study of differences in mating strategies, Clark and Hatfield (1989, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–54) found that men and women demonstrated a striking difference in interest in casual sex. The current study examined the role of an imagined requestor’s physical attractiveness (slightly unattractive, moderately attractive, and exceptionally attractive) on men’s and women’s willingness to accept three different requests (go out, come to apartment, go to bed) as reflected in answers to a questionnaire. We tested two hypotheses with a sample of 427 men and 443 women from three countries. Hypothesis 1 states that men, relative to women, will demonstrate a greater willingness to accept the “come to apartment” and “go to bed” requests but not the “go out” request for all three levels of requestor attractiveness. This hypothesis reflects Clark and Hatfield’s main findings. Hypothesis 2 states that the physical attractiveness of a potential partner will have a greater effect on women’s than on men’s willingness to accept all three requests, and particularly for the explicit request for casual sex. The results partially supported Hypothesis 1 and fully supported Hypothesis 2. The discussion highlights limitations of the current research and presents directions for future research.
KeywordsSex differences Mating Short-term mating Physical attractiveness
- How Willing Are You to Accept Sexual Requests from Slightly Unattractive to Exceptionally Attractive Imagined Requestors?
Volume 20, Issue 3 , pp 282-293
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Sex differences
- Short-term mating
- Physical attractiveness
- Industry Sectors