Testing the Controversy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Critics of evolutionary psychology and sociobiology have advanced an adaptationists-as-right-wing-conspirators (ARC) hypothesis, suggesting that adaptationists use their research to support a right-wing political agenda. We report the first quantitative test of the ARC hypothesis based on an online survey of political and scientific attitudes among 168 US psychology Ph.D. students, 31 of whom self-identified as adaptationists and 137 others who identified with another non-adaptationist meta-theory. Results indicate that adaptationists are much less politically conservative than typical US citizens and no more politically conservative than non-adaptationist graduate students. Also, contrary to the “adaptationists-as-pseudo-scientists” stereotype, adaptationists endorse more rigorous, progressive, quantitative scientific methods in the study of human behavior than non-adaptationists.
- Alcock, J. (2000). Misbehavior: How Stephen Jay Gould is wrong about evolution. Boston Review, April/May. Retrieved August 31, 2005 from http://www.bostonreview.net/BR25.2/alcock.html.
- Allen, E., et al. (1975). Against sociobiology. New York Review of Books, 22(182), 184–186, (November 13).
- Andrews, P. A., Gangestad, S. W., & Matthews, D. (2002). Adaptationism—How to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, 489–553. CrossRef
- Benton, T. (2000). Social causes and natural relations. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 206–224). London: Harmony Books.
- Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548. CrossRef
- Conway, L. G. III, & Schaller, M. (2002). On the verifiability of evolutionary psychological theories: An analysis of the psychology of scientific persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 152–166. CrossRef
- Dagg, A. I. (2005). “Love of shopping” is not a gene: Problems with Darwinian psychology. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
- Dawkins, R. (1985). Review of Not in our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature by R. Lewontin, S. Rose, & L. Kamin. New Scientist, 24, 59–60.
- Dennett, D. C. (1997). Darwinian fundamentalism: An exchange. New York Review of Books, 44, 64–65, (August 14).
- Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Beyond difference: Feminism and evolutionary psychology. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 174–189). London: Harmony Books.
- Gould, S. J. (1997a). Darwinian fundamentalism. New York Review of Books, 44, 34–37, (June 12).
- Gould, S. J. (1997b). Evolution: The pleasures of pluralism. New York Review of Books, 44, 47–52, (June 26).
- Gould, S. J. (1997c). Darwinian fundamentalism: An exchange. New York Review of Books, 44, 64, (August 14).
- Gould, S. J. (1997d). Evolutionary psychology: An exchange. New York Review of Books, 44, 56–58, (October 9).
- Gould, S. J. (2000). More things on heaven and earth. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 85–105). London: Harmony Books.
- Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marcos and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581–598. CrossRef
- Hagen, E. (2005). Controversial issues in evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–176). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Holcomb, H. R. III (1998). Testing evolutionary hypotheses. In C. Crawford & D. R. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 303–334). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 1–21. CrossRef
- Kurzban, R. (2001). Alas poor evolutionary psychology: Unfairly accused, unjustly condemned. Human Nature Review, 2, 99–109.
- Kurzban, R., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Making hay out of straw: Real and imagined controversies in evolutionary psychology. In J. H. Barkow (Ed.), Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists. Oxford University Press, (pp. 149–162).
- Lewontin, R., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Nelkin, D. (2000). Less selfish than sacred? Genes and the religious impulse in evolutionary psychology. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 14–27). London: Harmony Books.
- Pew Research Center for The People and The Press (2005). Beyond red vs. blue: Republicans divided about role of government – Democrats by societal and personal values. Accessed August 31, 2005 from http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PRC_politicaltypology_0505.pdf.
- Pinker, S. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: An exchange. New York Review of Books, 44, 56–58, (October 9).
- Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
- Plotkin, H. C. (2004). Evolutionary thought in psychology: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publications.
- Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56, 205–215. CrossRef
- Rose, S. (1997). Lifelines: Biology, freedom, and determinism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rose, H., & Rose, S. (2000a). Introduction. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 1–13). London: Harmony Books.
- Rose, H., & Rose, S. (Eds.) (2000b). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London: Harmony Books.
- Segerstrale, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociology debate and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wright, R. (1997). Darwinian fundamentalism: An exchange. New York Review of Books, 44, 65, (August 14).
- Testing the Controversy
Volume 18, Issue 4 , pp 313-328
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Political attitudes
- Sociology of science