Human Nature

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 419–432

Menstrual synchrony: Fact or artifact?

Authors

    • Institute of anthropologyPolish Academy of Sciences
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12110-006-1004-0

Cite this article as:
Ziomkiewicz, A. Hum Nat (2006) 17: 419. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1004-0

Abstract

Although more than thirty years of intensive investigation have passed since McClintock first published results on menstrual synchrony, there is still no conclusive evidence for the existence of this phenomenon. Indeed, a growing body of nullresult studies, critiques of menstrual synchrony studies, and the lack of convincing evolutionary explanations bring into question the existence of this phenomenon. This paper presents results of a study conducted over five consecutive months in Polish student dormitories. In 18 pairs and 21 triples of college-age women, menstrual synchrony was not found. Social interactions, considered the most important factor mediating the effect of menstrual synchrony, was unrelated to any difference in menstrual cycle onsets. Initial menstrual onset difference was influenced by woman’s body mass and menstrual cycle irregularity. These results provide further evidence that women do not synchronize their menstrual cycles.

Key words

Menstrual cycleMenstrual synchronySocial interactions
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2007