Albonetti, C. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Theory of discretionary decision-making in felony.
Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems
Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses. Law and Society Review
AOUSC (2001). Court and community: The U.S. Probation and pretrial services system. In U. P. a. P. Services (Ed.), Administrative Office of the US Courts.
Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons Publishers.
Bridges, G., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review
Bushway, S. D., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review
Cosgrove, E. J. (1994). Robo-po: The life and times of a federal probation officer. Federal Probation, 58(3), 29–30.
D’Anca, A. R. (2001). Role of the federal probation officer in the guidelines sentencing system. Federal Probation, 65(3), 20–23.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica
Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal court sentencing. American Journal of Sociology
Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1991). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000a). Conceptualizing legally relevant factors under guidelines: A reply to Ulmer. Criminology
Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000b). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology
Engen, R., Gainey, R., Crutchfield, R., & Weis, J. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology
Everett, R. S., & Nienstedt, B. C. (1999). Race, remorse, and sentence reduction: Is saying you’re sorry enough? Justice Quarterly
Fearn, N. E. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly
Frankel, M. E. (1973). Criminal sentences: Law without order. New York: Hill and Wang.
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harris, A. (2007). Diverting and abdicating judicial discretion: Cultural, political, and procedural dynamics in California juvenile justice. Law and Society Review
Hofer, P. J., Loeffler, C., Blackwell, K., & Valentino, P. (2004). Fifteen years of guideline sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. In U. S. S. Commission (Ed.) (pp. 246): United States Sentencing Commission.
Hoffman, P. D. (2003). History of the federal parole system (pp. 83): US Department of Justice.
Holleran, D., & Spohn, C. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology
Johnson, B. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology
Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly
Kautt, P. M., & DeLone, M. A. (2006). Sentencing outcomes under competing but coexisting sentencing interventions: Untying the Gordian knot. Criminal Justice Review
Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. (2002). Cracking down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions between offender race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1).
Kautt, P. M., & Spohn, C. C. (2007). Assessing blameworthiness and assigning punishment: Theoretical perspectives on judicial decision making. In D. E. Duffee, & E. R. Maguire (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 155–180). New York, NY: Routledge.
Klepper, S., Nagin, D., & Tierney, L. (1983). Discrimination in the criminal justice system - a critical appraisal of the literature. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. E. Martin, & M. H. Tonry (Eds.), Research on sentencing - the search for reform (pp. 55–128). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
LaFree, G. D. (1985). Official reactions to Hispanic defendants in the southwest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
LaFrentz, C. D., & Spohn, C. (2006). Who is punished more harshly in federal court? The interaction of race/ethnicity, gender, age, and employment status in the sentencing of drug offenders. Justice Research and Policy
Lawrence, P. B., & Hofer, P. J. (1992). An empirical study of the application of the relevant conduct guideline. Federal Setencing Reporter, 4, 330–334.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1980). Applied regression: An introduction, Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKinon, J., White, H., & Davidson, R. (1983). Tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses: Some further results. Journal of Econometrics
Maveal, G. M. (1996). Federal presentence reports: Multi-tasking at sentencing. Seton Hall Law Review, 26, 544–596.
Miethe, T. (1987). Charging and plea-bargaining under determinate sentencing: The hydraulic displacement of discretion. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Miller, L. L., & Eisenstein, J. (2005). The federal/state criminal prosecution nexus: A case study in cooperation and discretion. Law and Social Inquiry
Moerbeck, M. (2004). The consequence of ignoring a level of nesting in multilevel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research
Moore, C. A., & Miethe, T. D. (1986). Regulated and unregulated sentencing decisions: An analysis of first year practices under Minnesota’s felony sentencing guidelines. Law and Society Review
Nagel, I. H., & Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66(1), 501–566.
Parker, K. F., & Maggard, S. R. (2005). Structural theories and race-specific drug arrests: What structural factors account for the rise in race-specific drug arrests over time? Crime and Delinquency
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ruback, R. B., Ruth, G. R., & Shaffer, J. N. (2005). Assessing the impact of statutory change: A statewide multilevel analysis of restitution orders in Pennsylvania. Crime and Delinquency
Ruback, R. B., & Wroblewski, J. (2001). The federal sentencing guidelines: Psychological and policy reasons for simplification. Psychology, Public Policy and Law
Rubin, A. B., & Bartell, L. B. (1989). Law clerk handbook (No. FJC-M-89-2). Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Sabol, W. J. (1989). Racially disproportionate prison populations in the united states: An overview of historical patterns and review of contemporary issues. Contemporary Crises
Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1981–2). The effects of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review
Steen, S., Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing and criminal sentencing. Criminology
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology
Thomas, R. L. (1982). Court-prosecutor-probation officer: When is discretion disparity in the criminal justice system? Federal Probation, 46, 57–62.
Tonry, M. H. (1987). Sentencing reform impacts. Washington, DC.: National Institute of Justice.
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Ulmer, J. T. (2000). The rules have changed-so proceed with caution: A comment on Engen and Gainey’s method for modeling sentencing outcomes under guidelines. Criminology
Ulmer, J. T. (2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. District courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction
Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology
USSC (1991). The federal sentencing guidelines: A report on the operation of the guidelines system and short-term impacts on disparity in sentencing, use of incarceration, and prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
USSC (1999). United states sentencing commission, guidelines manual, §3e1.1 (nov. 1999). In U. S. S. Commission (Ed.).
USSC (2000). United states sentencing commission, guidelines manual, §3e1.1 (nov. 2000). In U. S. S. Commission (Ed.).
USSC (2001). United states sentencing commission, guidelines manual, §3e1.1 (nov. 2001). In U. S. S. Commission (Ed.).
USSC (2002). United states sentencing commission guidelines manual, §3e1.1 (nov. 2002). In U. S. S. Commission (Ed.).
Wilmot, K. A., & Spohn, C. (2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review
Wooldredge, J., & Griffin, T. (2005). Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Justice