The role of CCN2 in cartilage and bone development
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Kubota, S. & Takigawa, M. J. Cell Commun. Signal. (2011) 5: 209. doi:10.1007/s12079-011-0123-5
- 427 Views
CCN2, a classical member of the CCN family of matricellular proteins, is a key molecule that conducts cartilage development in a harmonized manner through novel molecular actions. During vertebrate development, all cartilage is primarily formed by a process of mesenchymal condensation, while CCN2 is induced to promote this process. Afterwards, cartilage develops into several subtypes with different fates and missions, in which CCN2 plays its proper roles according to the corresponding microenvironments. The history of CCN2 in cartilage and bone began with its re-discovery in the growth cartilage in long bones, which determines the skeletal size through the process of endochondral ossification. CCN2 promotes physiological developmental processes not only in the growth cartilage but also in the other types of cartilages, i.e., Meckel’s cartilage representing temporary cartilage without autocalcification, articular cartilage representing hyaline cartilage with physical stiffness, and auricular cartilage representing elastic cartilage. Together with its significant role in intramembranous ossification, CCN2 is regarded as a conductor of skeletogenesis. During cartilage development, the CCN2 gene is dynamically regulated to yield stage-specific production of CCN2 proteins at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. New functional aspects of known biomolecules have been uncovered during the course of investigating these regulatory systems in chondrocytes. Since CCN2 promotes integrated regeneration as well as generation (=development) of these tissues, its utility in regenerative therapy targeting chondrocytes and osteoblasts is indicated, as has already been supported by experimental evidence obtained in vivo.
Re-discovery of CCN2 in growth cartilage
CCN2, also known as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), was originally identified in 1991 as a platelet-derived growth factor-related protein with mitogenic activity toward fibroblasts (Bradham et al. 1991), which finding prompted the initial name given to this molecule. Afterwards, at least 8 different names were given to this single molecule (Perbal and Takigawa 2005), until the unified nomenclature was finally proposed in 2003 (Brigstock et al. 2003). As a result, CCN2 was given as the name for this second-oldest known molecule among the 6 CCN family members, based on this new terminology.
During this emerging period, a gene segment that was specifically expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes in the mouse growth plate was cloned from the cDNA obtained from human chondrocytic HCS-2/8 cells (Takigawa et al. 1989) via the differential display PCR method (Nakanishi et al. 1997). This molecular clone was designated hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene 24 (Hcs-24). Nucleotide sequence analysis of this clone revealed that Hcs-24 was identical to Ctgf. Starting from this re-discovery of CTGF in growth plate cartilage and a human chondrocytic cell line, critical roles of CCN2 in chondrocytes have been uncovered up to today.
Molecular action of CCN2 in cartilage
Cartilage is a connective tissue characterized physically by its proper elasticity. This tissue is avascular, and the cells are surrounded by a vast amount of extracellular matrix (ECM). Therefore, signal transmission to/from chondrocytes generally occurs via the interaction of signaling factors with cartilaginous ECM molecules, which is referred to as a matricrine molecular action (Chen and Lau 2009). In such a microenvironment, an extracellular information network is formed on the basis of the ECM scaffold. For the harmonized formation and maintenance of this network, CCN2 is thought to be required, because of its novel structure and functionality (Kubota and Takigawa 2007).
Classification of cartilage in vertebrates
CCN2 in the growth plate
After the formation of cartilage anlagen, growth plates are formed near both ends, facing the ossification centers. Here, chondrocytes undergo a series of differentiation steps to grow and calcify the bones. Along with bone growth, resting chondrocytes in a deep zone of the cartilage begin to proliferate and undergo maturation, producing a cartilaginous ECM including type II collagen and aggrecan as components, in order to support the bone growth. At the final step, chondrocytes differentiate into the hypertrophic chondrocytes that trigger matrix vesicle-mediated calcification, while producing type X collagen and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13, and are then removed by phagocytosis by chondroclasts and/or apoptosis. Thereafter, osteoblasts and vascular endothelial cells are recruited to replace the hypertrophic layer of growth cartilage with bone tissue. As mentioned in a previous section, CCN2 was initially found specifically in the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate; and later, pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes were confirmed to be the major producer of CCN2. Since CCN2 is a matricellular protein, it can be stored in, and infiltrate through, the ECM. In fact, immunohistochemical staining of CCN2 shows strong signals in pre-hypertrophic and hypertrophic layers and significant signals in proliferating layer and cartilage-bone junction in the growth plate. Of importance, it has also been shown that CCN2 promotes the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and vascular endothelial cells (Nishida et al. 2000; Safadi et al. 2003; Shimo et al. 1999; Nishida et al. 2011), as well as the chondrocytes themselves in vitro (Nakanishi et al. 2000). Additionally, the growth plate-produced CCN2 may be a possible source of the CCN2 accumulated in platelets (Cicha et al. 2004; Kubota et al. 2004; Sumiyoshi et al. 2010). Collectively, the mission of CCN2 in the growth plate is to promote all of the steps of bone formation in a harmonized manner (Kubota and Takigawa 2007). These indications are firmly supported by the phenotype of ccn2-null mice. In such mice, the growth plate is characterized by an abnormal morphological appearance with an enlarged hypertrophic layer (Ivkovic et al. 2003). From functional aspects, endochondral ossification is on the whole delayed; and ECM production is depressed therein, which features are accompanied, interestingly, by an unusual induction of CCN3 with counteracting functions (Kawaki et al. 2008a). Such a role of CCN2 in endochondral ossification is also represented by the fact that CCN2 accelerates bone regeneration (Kikuchi et al. 2008), in which endochondral ossification recurs (Nakata et al. 2002).
These pleiotropic effects of CCN2 on chondrocytes are known to be mediated by multiple intracellular second messengers of signal transduction, which include protein kinase C (PKC); mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as p38MAPK, extracellular regulated protein kinase (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K); and protein kinase B (PKB) (Yosimichi et al. 2006). CCN2 supposedly ignites these signaling pathways either directly via cell-surface receptors or indirectly via other extracellular cofactors, resulting in the initiation of these multiple signaling cascades.
CCN2 in Meckel’s cartilage
Meckel’s cartilage arises from mesodermal progenitor cells situated in close proximity to the zone of mineralization during mandibular bone formation (Couly et al. 1993). The chondrocytes involved therein also go through a differentiation process similar to that of growth plate chondrocytes; however, Meckel’s cartilage never calcifies itself. Interestingly, in spite of the jaw-like shape of the Meckel’s cartilage, the mineralized jaw is constructed by an intramembranous ossification process occurring at a zone facing the cartilage (Mina 2001); and, thereafter, Meckel’s cartilage disappears. The fate of this transient cartilage is reminiscent of that of the notochord, which leaves the nucleus pulposus as its memento. Of note, nucleus pulposus cells also produce CCN2 (Erwin et al. 2006)
The role of CCN2 in Mechel’s cartilage was investigated and reported in 2004 by Shimo et al. Enhanced ccn2 expression is observed in 2 distinct developmental stages, one being mesenchymal condensation and the other, hypertrophic-like late differentiation. Also, application of recombinant CCN2 (rCCN2) to cultured chondrocytes isolated from Meckel’s cartilage stimulates the condensation and later differentiation of those cells (Shimo et al. 2004). It should be noted that CCN2 acts through the ECM on the proximal cell population and promotes the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts. Although Meckel’s cartilage itself does not metamorphose into mandibular bone, the hypertrophic chondrocytes therein produce CCN2 that recruits osteoblasts and promotes bone formation. Therefore, basically, the roles of chondrocytes and CCN2 in intramembranous jaw bone formation may not remarkably differ from those in the growth plate.
CCN2 in articular cartilage
Articular cartilage is the permanent cartilage that enables the flexible movement between bones connected by a joint. Like growth-plate cartilage, this tissue originates from the same cartilage anlagen, but remains unmineralized at the end of the bone even after the completion of skeletal growth (Karaplis 2002). Thus, chondrocytes in this type of cartilage do not undergo hypertrophic differentiation towards calcification, except under pathological conditions. The most common pathological change found clinically in articular cartilage is osteoarthritis (OA). After a long time of mechanical overload or another equivalent stimulus, articular cartilage is damaged physically and by inflammation, which damage is accompanied by cluster formation and abnormal hypertrophic changes in chondrocytes, eventually forming osteophytes.
CCN2 in auricular cartilage
In humans, pinnae may not have a critical function in biological life, but they are still esthetically important parts of our faces. From this point of view, regulated regeneration of auricular cartilage is desirable in the case of traumatic injury to the pinna. In contrast to articular cartilage, auricular cartilage is characterized by a more elastic physical property, which is provided by the inclusion of elastin fibers, suggesting a different molecular background. In 2008, effects of rCCN2 on auricular chondrocytes from normal rabbits were evaluated. The results showed, however, quite similar effects to those on articular chondrocytes. Namely, rCCN2 promoted both the proliferation and differentiation of these cells, including the ability to produce elastin, a marker of elastic cartilage, without inducing abnormal hypertrophy. Finally, ex vivo application of rCCN2 was shown to also promote the generation of auricular cartilage, further suggesting the integrated effect of CCN2 on cartilage generation and repair (Fujisawa et al. 2008).
Intramembranous ossification and CCN2
Although most skeletal parts are developed and grow through endochondral ossification, clavicle and cranial bones are directly formed by osteoblasts without passing through the cartilaginous stage, which is called intramembranous ossification. In this process, osteoblasts are differentiated directly from the nodules of condensed mesenchymal stem cells to deposit type I collagen and calcifying ECM components (Karaplis 2002). During the course of animal evolution, the exoskeleton was developed earlier than the endoskeleton. The former is constructed without cartilaginous anlagen, whereas the prototype of the latter is cartilage. This fundamental difference between these 2 types of bones is seen in Brachyura (Crab), which has a strong calcified exoskeleton and minor cartilaginous endoskeleton. Therefore, the cranial bones surrounding the brain may be regarded as working fossils in our skeleton.
Interestingly, a prototypic gene of ccn2 can be found even in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), which has no endoskeleton, suggesting a basic role of CCN2 in general skeletogenesis. Consistent with such an assumption and the fact that CCN2 promotes the formation, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro (Nishida et al. 2000; Safadi et al. 2003; Smerdel-Ramoya et al. 2008), CCN2 was found to be required for proper intramembranous ossification in vivo and in vitro through studies on conventional and conditional ccn2-null mice (Kawaki et al. 2008b; Canalis et al. 2010). Furthermore, the attenuated ossifying ability of ccn2-null osteoblasts is rescued by exogenously added rCCN2 (Kawaki et al. 2008b). Thus, CCN2 is now considered to conduct the formation of all of the skeletal parts, following the proper scenario given to each part.
Gene regulation during chondrocyte differentiation
It is widely recognized that CCN2 production is strongly induced by TGF-β via a transcriptional mechanism (Leask and Abraham 2006). Also in chondrocytes, this regulation appears dominant; and it was reported that the induction of ccn2 by TGF-β is partly dependent on the known cis-acting sequence in the Ccn2 proximal promoter. This induction could be the net effect of the direct action by TGF-β and an indirect effect through endothelin 1. Of further interest, another transcriptional enhancer dominant in chondrocytes (TRENDIC) has been identified (Eguchi et al. 2002). TRENDIC is also located in the proximal promoter region and mediates ccn2 induction in a stronger manner in chondrocytes than in other types of the cells. Subsequent study identified matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) as being a TRENDIC-binding protein (Eguchi et al. 2008). Surprisingly, this report thus unveiled this unexpected functional property of MMP-3, which had been previously regarded only as an ECM-degradating enzyme.
Hypoxic regulation of CCN2 production is known to occur in chondrocytic cells, in which a post-transcriptional regulatory element in the 3′-untranslated region, termed cis-acting element of structure-anchored repression (CAESAR), mediates the regulation of the mRNA stability by a CAESAR-binding protein (Kubota et al. 2000; Kondo et al. 2006). Contribution of post-transcriptional regulatory events to the stage-specific induction of CCN2 during chondrocytic differentiation was investigated with chicken embryonic chondrocytes. Then, nucleophosmin (NPM/B23) was re-discovered as being a specific RNA-binding regulator of the degradation of ccn2 mRNA. According to this study, down-regulation of NPM, which had been previously known only as a histone chaperon, eventually stabilizes the ccn2 mRNA to increase the steady-state level of the mRNA upon hypertrophic differentiation (Mukudai et al. 2008). This regulation is mediated by a cis-element in the 3′-UTR other than CAESAR and, interestingly, is chondrocyte specific. Additionally, a recent report indicated a repressive effect on the chondrocyte phenotype by a micro RNA (Siomi and Siomi 2009), miR-18a, which is mediated, at least in part, through translational repression of the Ccn2 mRNA (Ohgawara et al. 2009). All of these post-transcriptional regulations take place in the 3′-UTR, which is consistent with the fundamental rule of gene regulation that has been conserved throughout animal evolution (Merritt et al. 2008). In addition, retinoic acid drastically increases the steady-state level of ccn2 mRNA specifically in hypertrophic chondrocytes through MAPK-mediated signaling, although its precise mechanism remains to be clarified (Shimo et al. 2005)
Medical utility of CCN2 and its derivatives
As introduced above, the molecular actions of CCN family members are based on multiple interactions with numerous molecules, which support the integrated and harmonized promotion of tissue development. Therefore, CCN2 is thought to be an ideal molecule to be utilized in the regenerative therapy of various types of cartilages and bone. The utility of CCN2 in the regeneration of damaged articular cartilage and bone was already proven in vivo (Nishida et al. 2004; Kikuchi et al. 2008; Ono et al. 2008), which may lead to the development of a novel anti-OA therapeutic. Similarly, CCN2 may possibly be employed to construct a bioengineered pinna ex vivo for plastic surgery. Moreover, if we could control the CCN2 in the growth plate, we may be able to control body height and shape during the growing period, which may be called “skeletal designing.”
This study was supported by grants from the program Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (S) [to M.T.], and (C) [to S.K.] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.