Adelman LM, Falk J, James S. Impact of national aquarium in Baltimore on visitors’ conservation attitudes, behavior, and knowledge. Curator. 2000;43(1):33–61.CrossRef
Allen S. Designs for learning: studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Sci Educ. 2004;88 Suppl 1:S17–33.CrossRef
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
Anderson D, Lucas KB, Ginns IS, Dierking LD. Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Sci Educ. 2000;84(5):658–79.CrossRef
Bamberger Y, Tal T. Learning in a personal context: levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Sci Educ. 2007;91(1):75–95.CrossRef
Banet E, Ayuso GE. Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. Int J Sci Educ. 2003;25:273–407.CrossRef
Beer G. Darwin’s plots: evolutionary narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and nineteenth-century fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.CrossRef
Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA, editors. Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, National Research Council. Washington: NAS Press; 2009.
Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:415–28.CrossRef
Bloom P, Weisberg DS. Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science. 2007;316:996–7.CrossRef
Borun M. Being human: a design in process, four focus groups. University of Pennsylvania Museum: Museum Solutions; 2002.
Botelho A, Morais AM. Students–exhibits interaction at a science center. J Res Sci Teach. 2006;43:987–1018.CrossRef
Brumby M. Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. J Biol Educ. 1979;13:119–22.CrossRef
Bybee RW. Achieving scientific literacy: strategies for insuring that free-choice science education complements national formal science education efforts. In: Falk JH, editor. Free-choice science education: how we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers College Press; 2001. p. 44–63.
Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1985.
Catley KM. Darwin’s missing link—a novel paradigm for evolution education. Sci Educ. 2006;90:767–83.CrossRef
Crowley K, Jacobs M. Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In: Leinhardt G, Crowley K, Knutson K, editors. Learning conversations in museums. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002.
Crowley K, Callanan MA, Jipson JL, Galco J, Topping K, Shrager J. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Sci Educ. 2001;85:712.CrossRef
D’Elia G, Jörgensen C. National survey of the markets for museums, public libraries, public television, public radio, and their engagement in informal learning activities. Report submitted to the Urban Libraries Council. Buffalo: State University of New York, School of Informatics; 2003.
Diamond J, Evans EM. Museums teach evolution. Evolution. 2007;61(6):1500–6.CrossRef
Diamond J, Evans EM, Spiegel A. Walking whales and singing flies: an evolution exhibit and assessment of its impact. In: Rosengren, KR, Brem, S, Evans, EM, Sinatra, G, editors. Evolution challenges: integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. London: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 587–614.
Diamond J, Scotchmoor J. Exhibiting evolution. Mus Soc Issues. 2006;1(1):21–48.CrossRef
Duncan RG, Hmelo-Silver CE. Editorial: learning progressions: aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. J Res Sci Teach. 2009;46:606–9.CrossRef
Evans EM. The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Q J Dev Psychol. 2000;46:221–54.
Evans EM. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cogn Psychol. 2001;42:217–66.CrossRef
Evans EM. Teaching and learning about evolution. In: Diamond J, editor. The virus and the whale: explore evolution in creatures small and large. Arlington: NSTA Press; 2005. p. 25–41.
Evans EM. Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In: Vosniadou S, editor. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 263–94.
Evans EM, Spiegel AN, Tare M, Frazier BF, Cover S, Gram W, et al. A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 2010;47(3):326–53.
Evans EM, Legare C, Rosengren K. Engaging multiple epistemologies: implications for science education. In: Ferrari M, Taylor R, editors. Epistemology and science education: understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 111–39.
Evans EM, Rosengren K, Lane JD, Price KS. Encountering counterintuitive ideas: constructing a developmental learning progression for biological evolution. In Rosengren KR, Brem S, Evans EM, Sinatra G, editors. Evolution challenges: integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. London: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Falk JH, Adelman LM. Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. J Res Sci Teach. 2003;40(2):163–76.CrossRef
Falk JH, Dierking LD. Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press; 2000.
Falk JH, Dierking LD. Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press; 2002.
Falk J, Storksdieck M. Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Sci Educ. 2005;89(5):744–78.CrossRef
Falk JH, Storksdieck M, Dierking LD. Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Underst Sci. 2007;16:455–69.CrossRef
Gelman SA. The essential child: origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef
Greene ED. The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:875–85.CrossRef
Gregory TR. Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evol Educ Outreach. 2009;2:156–75.CrossRef
Hayward J, Hart J, Gyllenhaal E. Summative evaluation of the “Life Over Time” exhibit at the Field Museum. Northampton: People, Places, and Design Research; 1996.
Jiménez-Aleixandre MP. Teaching evolution and natural selection: a look at textbooks and teachers. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:519–35.CrossRef
Jungwirth E. Preconceived adaptation and inverted evolution: a case of distorted concept formation in high school biology. Aust Sci Teach J. 1975;21:95–100.
Keil FC. The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: the origins of concepts of living things. In: Hirschfeld LA, Gelman SA, editors. Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 234–54.CrossRef
Kelemen D. The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition. 1999;70:241–72.CrossRef
Korn R. An analysis of differences between visitors at natural history museums and science centers. Curator. 1995;38(3):150–60.CrossRef
Legare C, Lane J, Evans EM. Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts? Merrill-Palmer Q J Dev Psychol. 2012; (in press)
Lerner LS. Good science, bad science: teaching evolution in the states. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation; 2000.
Macfadden BJ, Dunckel BA, Ellis S, Dierking LD, Abraham-Silver L, Kisiel J, et al. Natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. BioScience. 2007;57(10):875–82.CrossRef
Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.
Mazur A. Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Polit Life Sci. 2005;8:55–61.
Medin DL, Atran S. The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychol Rev. 2004;111(4):9960–83.CrossRef
Miller JD. The acquisition and retention of scientific information by American adults. In: Falk JH, editor. Free-choice science education: how we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers College Press; 2001. p. 93–114.
Moore R, Kraemer K. The teaching of evolution & creationism in Minnesota. Am Biol Teach. 2005;67(8):457–66.
National Research Council. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB-12-01); 2012.
Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS. Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-ended instrument, and an oral interview. J Res Sci Teach. 2008;45(10):1131–60.CrossRef
Nehm RH, Kim SY, Sheppard K. Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non-biology teachers. Sci Educ. 2010a;93:1122–46. doi:10.1002/sce.20340
Nehm RH, Rector MA, Ha M. “Force-talk” in evolutionary explanation: metaphors and misconceptions. Evol Educ Outreach. 2010b;3:605–13.CrossRef
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:625–32.CrossRef
Numbers RL. The creationists: the evolution of scientific creationism. New York: Knopf; 1992.
Nunnally J. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
Passmore C, Stewart J. A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39:185–204.CrossRef
Pawlukiewicz JD, Doering Z, Paasch K. Views from the audience: planning a new exhibition on human evolution. Paper presented at the Current Trends in Audience Research and Evaluation Conference, Washington, DC.; 1990.
People for the American Way. Evolution and creationism in public education: an in-depth reading of public opinion: results of a comprehensive, national survey. Washington, DC: People for the American Way; 2000.
People, Places, and Design Research. Life over time, formative evaluation study #3: visitors’ understanding of scientific terms. Northampton: People, Places and Design Research; 1992.
Poling DA, Evans EM. Why do birds of a feather flock together? Developmental change in the use of multiple explanations: intention, teleology, essentialism. Br J Dev Psychol. 2002;20:89–112.CrossRef
Quammen D. The reluctant Mr. Darwin. New York: Norton; 2006.
Ramey-Gassert L, Walberg III HJ, Walberg HJ. Reexamining connections: museums as science learning environments. Sci Educ. 1994;78(4):345.CrossRef
Rutledge ML, Mitchell MA. High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 2002;64(1):21–8.CrossRef
Sinatra GM, Brem SK, Evans EM. Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evol Educ Outreach. 2008;1:189–95.CrossRef
Smithsonian Institution. Eaters of the Smithsonian sun: characteristics of visitors to Smithsonian museums. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, Office of Policy and Analysis; 2006.
Smithsonian Institution. Nature, science and culture on display: results from the 2009–2010 National Museum of Natural History Visitor Survey. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, Office of Policy and Analysis; 2010.
Southerland SA, Abrams E, Cummins CL, Anzelmo J. Understanding students’ explanations of biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or P-Prims. Sci Educ. 2001;85:328–48.CrossRef
Spiegel AN, Evans EM, Gram W, Diamond J. Museum visitors understanding of evolution. Mus Soc Issues. 2006;1(1):69–86.CrossRef
Sprinkle RH. Unremembered intimacies. Review of “beasts of the earth: animals, humans, and disease” by E. F. Torrey and R. H. Yolken. BioScience. 2006;56:166–7.CrossRef
Squire J, Hubbell Mackinney L. Learning from Lucy: What visitors want to know about human evolution. An evaluation study of the Lucy skeleton in the “Creatures of the Ice Age” exhibit at the California Academy of Sciences. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences; 1996.
St. John M, Perry D. A framework for evaluation and research: science, infrastructure and relationships. In: Bicknell S, Farmelo G, editors. Museum visitor studies in the 90’s. London: Science Museum; 1993. p. 59–66.
Stein JK, Storksdieck M. Life changes museum visitor survey: summary of results. Annapolis: Institute for Learning Innovation; 2005.
Tare M, French J, Frazier B, Diamond J, Evans EM. Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Sci Educ. 2011;95:720–44. doi:10.1002/sce.20433
Trowbridge JE, Wandersee JH. Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31:459–73.CrossRef
Vadeboncoeur JA. Chapter 7: engaging young people: learning in informal contexts. Rev Res Educ. 2006;30(1):239–78.CrossRef
Vosniadou S. Conceptual change research: an introduction. In: Vosniadou S, editor. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. xiii–xxviii.
Vosniadou S, Vamvakoussi X, Skopeliti I. The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In: Vosniadou S, editor. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 3–34.
Wellman HM, Gelman SA. Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In: Damon W, Kuhn D, Siegler R, editors. Handbook of child psychology: vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 523–74.
Zohar A, Ginossar S. Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions. Sci Educ. 1998;82:679–97.CrossRef