Neurocritical Care

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 101–106

The Effect of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy on Brain Temperature After Severe Brain Injury

Authors

    • Department of Neurovascular ServiceUniversity of California San Francisco
    • Department of NeurologyUniversity of California San Francisco
  • Nancy K. Hills
    • Department of NeurologyUniversity of California San Francisco
  • Hooman Kamel
    • Department of NeurologyUniversity of California San Francisco
  • Diane Morabito
    • Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of California San Francisco
    • Brain and Spinal Injury CenterUniversity of California San Francisco
  • Pratik V. Patel
    • Department of Neurological SciencesRush University Medical Center
  • Geoffrey T. Manley
    • Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of California San Francisco
    • Brain and Spinal Injury CenterUniversity of California San Francisco
  • J. Claude HemphillIII
    • Department of NeurologyUniversity of California San Francisco
    • Brain and Spinal Injury CenterUniversity of California San Francisco
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9446-y

Cite this article as:
Nakagawa, K., Hills, N.K., Kamel, H. et al. Neurocrit Care (2011) 15: 101. doi:10.1007/s12028-010-9446-y

Abstract

Background

Animal studies have shown that even a small temperature elevation of 1°C can cause detrimental effects after brain injury. Since the skull acts as a potential thermal insulator, we hypothesized that decompressive hemicraniectomy facilitates surface cooling and lowers brain temperature.

Methods

Forty-eight patients with severe brain injury (TBI = 38, ICH = 10) with continuous brain temperature monitoring were retrospectively studied and grouped into “hemicraniectomy” (n = 20) or “no hemicraniectomy” (n = 28) group. The paired measurements of core body (TCore) and brain (TBr) temperature were recorded at 1-min intervals over 12 ± 7 days. As a surrogate measure for the extent of surface heat loss from the brain, ∆TCore−Br was calculated as the difference between TCore and TBr with each recording. In order to accommodate within-patient temperature correlations, mixed-model regression was used to assess the differences in ∆TCore−Br between those with and without hemicraniectomy, adjusted for core body temperature and diagnosis.

Results

A total of 295,883 temperature data pairs were collected (median [IQR] per patient: 5047 [3125–8457]). Baseline characteristics were similar for age, sex, diagnosis, incidence of sepsis, Glasgow Coma Scale score, ICU mortality, and ICU length of stay between the two groups. The mean difference in ∆TCore−Br was 1.29 ± 0.87°C for patients with and 0.80 ± 0.86°C for patients without hemicraniectomy (P < 0.0001). In mixed-model regression, accounting for temperature correlations within patients, hemicraniectomy and higher TCore were associated with greater ∆TCore−Br (hemicraniectomy: estimated effect = 0.60, P = 0.003; TCore: estimated effect = 0.21, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Hemicraniectomy is associated with modestly but significantly lower brain temperature relative to core body temperature.

Keywords

Decompressive hemicraniectomyBrain temperatureBrain tissue oxygen monitor

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010