A Novel System Improves Preservation of Osteochondral Allografts
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Osteochondral allografting is an option for successful treatment of large articular cartilage defects. Use of osteochondral allografting is limited by graft availability, often because of loss of chondrocyte viability during storage.
The purpose of this study was to compare osteochondral allografts implanted in canine knees after 28 days or 60 days of storage for (1) initial (1 week) safety and feasibility; (2) integrity and positioning with time (12 weeks and 6 months); and (3) gross, cell viability, histologic, biochemical, and biomechanical characteristics at an endpoint of 6 months.
With Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, adult dogs (n = 16) were implanted with 8-mm cylindrical osteochondral allografts in the lateral and medial femoral condyles of one knee. Osteochondral allografts preserved for 28 or 60 days using either the current tissue bank standard-of-care (SOC) or a novel system (The Missouri Osteochondral Allograft Preservation System, or MOPS) were used, creating four treatment groups: SOC 28-day, MOPS 28-day, SOC 60-day, and MOPS 60-day. Bacteriologic analysis of tissue culture and media were performed. Dogs were assessed by radiographs and arthroscopy at interim times and by gross, cell viability, histology, biochemistry, and biomechanical testing at the 6-month endpoint.
With the numbers available, there was no difference in infection frequency during storage (5% for SOC and 3% for MOPS; p = 0.5). No infected graft was implanted and no infections occurred in vivo. MOPS grafts had greater chondrocyte viability at Day 60 (90% versus 53%; p = 0.002). For 60-day storage, MOPS grafts were as good as or better than SOC grafts with respect to all outcome measures assessed 6 months after implantation.
Donor chondrocyte viability is important for osteochondral allograft success. MOPS allows preservation of chondrocyte viability for up to 60 days at sufficient levels to result in successful outcomes in a canine model of large femoral condylar articular defects.
These findings provide a promising development in osteochondral allograft technology that can benefit the quantity of grafts available for use and the quality of grafts being implanted.
- Allen, RT, Robertson, CM, Pennock, AT, Bugbee, WD, Harwood, FL, Wong, VW, Chen, AC, Sah, RL, Amiel, D (2005) Analysis of stored osteochondral allografts at the time of surgical implantation. Am J Sports Med. 33: pp. 1479-1484 CrossRef
- Amiel, D, Harwood, FL, Hoover, JA, Meyers, M (1989) A histological and biochemical assessment of the cartilage matrix obtained from in vitro storage of osteochondral allografts. Connect Tissue Res. 23: pp. 89-99 CrossRef
- Arnoczky, SP, Cook, JL, Carter, T, Turner, AS (2010) Translational models for studying meniscal repair and replacement: what they can and cannot tell us. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 16: pp. 31-39 CrossRef
- ASTM International guideline. ASTM F2451-05 (2010) Standard Guide for In Vivo Assessment of Implantable Devices Intended to Repair or Regenerate Articular Cartilage. Available at: http://www.astm.org/Standards/F2451.htm. Accessed June 16, 2014.
- Ball, ST, Amiel, D, Williams, SK, Tontz, W, Chen, AC, Sah, RL, Bugbee, WD (2004) The effects of storage on fresh human osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 418: pp. 246-252 CrossRef
- Bastian, JD, Egli, RJ, Ganz, R, Hofstetter, W, Leunig, M (2011) Chondrocytes within osteochondral grafts are more resistant than osteoblasts to tissue culture at 37°C. J Invest Surg. 24: pp. 28-34 CrossRef
- Black, J, Shadle, CA, Parsons, JR, Brighton, CT (1979) Articular cartilage preservation and storage: II. Mechanical indentation testing of viable, stored articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 22: pp. 1102-1108 CrossRef
- Brighton, CT, Shadle, CA, Jimenez, SA, Irwin, JT, Lane, JM, Lipton, M (1979) Articular cartilage preservation and storage: I. Application of tissue culture techniques to the storage of viable articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 22: pp. 1093-1101 CrossRef
- Chu, CR, Convery, FR, Akeson, WH, Meyers, M, Amiel, D (1999) Articular cartilage transplantation: clinical results in the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 360: pp. 159-168 CrossRef
- Cook, JL, Hung, CT, Kuroki, K, Stoker, AM, Cook, CR, Pfeiffer, FM, Sherman, SL, Stannard, JP (2014) Animal models for cartilage repair. Bone Joint Res. 3: pp. 89-94 CrossRef
- Cook JL, Hung CT, Lima E, Stoker A, inventors. Tissue Preservation System. US patent application 2012/0177615 A1. July 12, 2012.
- Cook, JL, Kuroki, K, Visco, D, Pelletier, JP, Schulz, L, Lafeber, FP (2010) The OARSI histopathology initiative: recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the dog. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 18: pp. S66-S79 CrossRef
- Emmerson, BC, Gortz, S, Jamali, AA, Chung, C, Amiel, D, Bugbee, WD (2007) Fresh osteochondral allografting in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle. Am J Sports Med. 35: pp. 907-914 CrossRef
- Farr, J, Cole, B, Dhawan, A, Kercher, J, Sherman, S (2011) Clinical cartilage restoration: evolution and overview. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469: pp. 2696-2705 CrossRef
- Garrity, JT, Stoker, AM, Sims, HJ, Cook, JL (2012) Improved osteochondral allograft preservation using serum-free media at body temperature. Am J Sports Med. 40: pp. 2542-2548 CrossRef
- Ghazavi, MT, Pritzker, KP, Davis, AM, Gross, AE (1997) Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79: pp. 1008-1013 CrossRef
- Gortz, S, Young, AJ, Bugbee, WD (2010) Fresh osteochondral allografting for steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral condyles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468: pp. 1269-1278 CrossRef
- Gregory, MH, Capito, N, Kuroki, K, Stoker, AM, Cook, JL, Sherman, SL (2012) A review of translational animal models for knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis. 2012: pp. 764621 CrossRef
- Gross, AE, Kim, W, Las Heras, F, Backstein, D, Safir, O, Pritzker, KP (2008) Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 466: pp. 1863-1870 CrossRef
- Gross, AE, Shasha, N, Aubin, P (2005) Long-term followup of the use of fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 435: pp. 79-87 CrossRef
- Gross, AE, Silverstein, EA, Falk, J, Falk, R, Langer, F (1975) The allotransplantation of partial joints in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 108: pp. 7-14 CrossRef
- Haudenschild, DR, Hong, E, Hatcher, S, Jamali, AA (2012) Chondrogenic potential and homogeneity of cell populations of donor and recipient cells in a fresh osteochondral allograft: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94: pp. e17 CrossRef
- Jamali, AA, Hatcher, SL, You, Z (2007) Donor cell survival in a fresh osteochondral allograft at twenty-nine years: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: pp. 166-169 CrossRef
- Krych, AJ, Robertson, CM, Williams, RJ (2012) Return to athletic activity after osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 40: pp. 1053-1059 CrossRef
- Linn, MS, Chase, DC, Healey, RM, Harwood, FL, Bugbee, WD, Amiel, D (2011) Etanercept enhances preservation of osteochondral allograft viability. Am J Sports Med. 39: pp. 1494-1499 CrossRef
- Malinin, T, Temple, HT, Buck, BE (2006) Transplantation of osteochondral allografts after cold storage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: pp. 762-770 CrossRef
- Pallante, AL, Chen, AC, Ball, ST, Amiel, D, Masuda, K, Sah, RL, Bugbee, WD (2012) The in vivo performance of osteochondral allografts in the goat is diminished with extended storage and decreased cartilage cellularity. Am J Sports Med. 40: pp. 1814-1823 CrossRef
- Pennock, AT, Robertson, CM, Wagner, F, Harwood, FL, Bugbee, WD, Amiel, D (2006) Does subchondral bone affect the fate of osteochondral allografts during storage?. Am J Sports Med. 34: pp. 586-591 CrossRef
- Pennock, AT, Wagner, F, Robertson, CM, Harwood, FL, Bugbee, WD, Amiel, D (2006) Prolonged storage of osteochondral allografts: does the addition of fetal bovine serum improve chondrocyte viability?. J Knee Surg. 19: pp. 265-272 CrossRef
- Roy, RG, Wallace, LJ, Johnston, GR, Wickstrom, SL (1992) A retrospective evaluation of stifle osteoarthritis in dogs with bilateral medial patellar luxation and unilateral surgical repair. Vet Surg. 21: pp. 475-479 CrossRef
- Sherman, SL, Garrity, J, Bauer, K, Cook, JL, Stannard, JP, Bugbee, W (2014) Fresh osteocondral allograft transplantation for the knee: current concepts review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 22: pp. 121-133 CrossRef
- Stoker, A, Garrity, JT, Hung, CT, Stannard, JP, Cook, J (2012) Improved preservation of fresh osteochondral allografts for clinical use. J Knee Surg. 25: pp. 117-125 CrossRef
- Teng, MS, Yuen, AS, Kim, HT (2008) Enhancing osteochondral allograft viability: effects of storage media composition. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 466: pp. 1804-1809 CrossRef
- Thomas, VJ, Jimenez, SA, Brighton, CT, Brown, N (1984) Sequential changes in the mechanical properties of viable articular cartilage stored in vitro. J Orthop Res. 2: pp. 55-60 CrossRef
- US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry: Preparation of IDEs and INDs for Products Intended to Repair or Replace Knee Cartilage. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm. Accessed June 11, 2014.
- Williams, JM, Virdi, AS, Pylawka, TK, Edwards, RB, Markel, MD, Cole, BJ (2005) Prolonged-fresh preservation of intact whole canine femoral condyles for the potential use as osteochondral allografts. J Orthop Res. 23: pp. 831-837 CrossRef
- Williams, RJ, Ranawat, AS, Potter, HG, Carter, T, Warren, RF (2007) Fresh stored allografts for the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: pp. 718-726 CrossRef
- Williams, SK, Amiel, D, Ball, ST, Allen, RT, Tontz, WL, Emmerson, BC, Badlani, NM, Emery, SC, Haghighi, P, Bugbee, WD (2007) Analysis of cartilage tissue on a cellular level in fresh osteochondral allograft retrievals. Am J Sports Med. 35: pp. 2022-2032 CrossRef
- Williams, SK, Amiel, D, Ball, ST, Allen, RT, Wong, VW, Chen, AC, Sah, RL, Bugbee, WD (2003) Prolonged storage effects on the articular cartilage of fresh human osteochondral allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85: pp. 2111-2120
- A Novel System Improves Preservation of Osteochondral Allografts
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 472, Issue 11 , pp 3404-3414
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Comparative Orthopaedic Laboratory & Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Avenue, DC953.000, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA
- 2. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA