Dual Plating of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Orthogonal Plates Biomechanically Outperform Side-by-Side Plates
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Single large-fragment plate constructs currently are the norm for internal fixation of middiaphyseal humerus fractures. In cases where humeral size is limited, however, dual small-fragment locking plate constructs may serve as an alternative. The mechanical effects of different possible plate configurations around the humeral diaphysis may be important, but to our knowledge, have yet to be investigated.
We used finite element analysis to compare the simulated mechanical performance of five different dual small-fragment locking plate construct configurations for humeral middiaphyseal fracture fixation in terms of (1) stiffness, (2) stress shielding of bone, (3) hardware stresses, and (4) interfragmentary strain.
Middiaphyseal humeral fracture fixation was simulated using the finite element method. Three 90° and two side-by-side seven-hole and nine-hole small-fragment dual locking plate configurations were tested in compression, torsion, and combined loading. The configurations chosen are based on implantation using either a posterior or anterolateral approach.
All three of the 90° configurations were more effective in restoring the intact compressive and torsional stiffness as compared with the side-by-side configurations, resulted in less stress shielding and stressed hardware, and showed interfragmentary strains between 5% to 10% in torsion and combined loading.
The nine-hole plate anterior and seven-hole plate lateral (90° apart) configuration provided the best fixation. Our findings show the mechanical importance of plate placement with relation to loading in dual-plate fracture-fixation constructs.
The results presented provide novel biomechanical information for the orthopaedic surgeon considering different treatment options for middiaphyseal humeral fractures.
- Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury. 2007;38:358–364. CrossRef
- Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Rice JC. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech. 1984;17:349–361. CrossRef
- Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC. Thermodynamic restrictions on the elastic constants of bone. J Biomech. 1986;19:85–87. CrossRef
- Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:488–493. CrossRef
- Fitzpatrick DC, Doornink J, Madey SM, Bottlang M. Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:203–209.
- Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Liporace F, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques. J Trauma. 2006;60:830–835. CrossRef
- Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34(suppl 2):B63–76. CrossRef
- Hak DJ, Althausen P, Hazelwood SJ. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough? J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:207–211. CrossRef
- Hepp P, Josten C. Biology and biomechanics in osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007;33:337–344. CrossRef
- Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:331–338. CrossRef
- Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Birdzell LT, Koval KJ. A biomechanical comparison of Schuhli nuts or cement augmented screws for plating of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;377:235–240. CrossRef
- Klaue K, Fengels I, Perren SM. Long-term effects of plate osteosynthesis: comparison of four different plates. Injury. 2000;31(suppl 2):S-B51–62.
- Kolodziej P, Lee FS, Patel A, Kassab SS, Shen KL, Yang KH, Mast JW. Biomechanical evaluation of the schuhli nut. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;347:79–85. CrossRef
- Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C, Keller TS. Modeling the onset and propagation of trabecular bone microdamage during low-cycle fatigue. J Biomech. 2008;41:515–522. CrossRef
- Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:74–81.
- Murdoch AH, Mathias KJ, Smith FW. Measurement of the bony anatomy of the humerus using magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002;216:31–35. CrossRef
- Nichols SJ, Landon GC, Tullos HS. Arthrodesis with dual plates after failed total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1020–1024.
- O’Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA Jr. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:709–715. CrossRef
- Patel R, Neu CP, Curtiss S, Fyhrie DP, Yoo B. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:300–305. CrossRef
- Perren SM, Cordey J, Rahn BA, Gautier E, Schneider E. Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants: a reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:139–151.
- Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1093–1110. CrossRef
- Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH. Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech. 1993;26:111–119. CrossRef
- Rubel IF, Kloen P, Campbell D, Schwartz M, Liew A, Myers E, Helfet DL. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral nonunions: a biomechanical and clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1315–1322.
- Shah S, Kim SY, Dubov A, Schemitsch EH, Bougherara H, Zdero R. The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both? Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011;225:845–856. CrossRef
- Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP: how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury. 2003;34(suppl 2):B11–B19. CrossRef
- Stoffel K, Klaue K, Perren SM. Functional load of plates in fracture fixation in vivo and its correlate in bone healing. Injury. 2000;31(suppl 2):37–86. CrossRef
- Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA. The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:479–486. CrossRef
- Sumner DR, Galante JO. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:202–212.
- Tan SL, Balogh ZJ. Indications and limitations of locked plating. Injury. 2009;40:683–691. CrossRef
- Verbruggen JP, Sternstein W, Blum J, Rommens PM, Stapert JW. Compression-locked nailing of the humerus: a mechanical analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:143–150. CrossRef
- Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34(suppl 2):B31–42. CrossRef
- Watts A, Weinhold P, Kesler W, Dahners L. A biomechanical comparison of short segment long bone fracture fixation techniques: single large fragment plate versus 2 small fragment plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:528–532. CrossRef
- Dual Plating of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Orthogonal Plates Biomechanically Outperform Side-by-Side Plates
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 472, Issue 4 , pp 1310-1317
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Bone and Joint Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard (CBH 407), Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
- 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, TX, USA