Comparison of Acetabular Anterior Coverage After Salter Osteotomy and Pemberton Acetabuloplasty: A Long-term Followup
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty are common procedures for a deficient acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. However, the degree of increasing retroversion and anterior acetabular coverage of these two procedures remains unanswered.
The purpose of this study is to show the change in anterior coverage and relevant parameters in measuring pain and function among patients who have undergone either a Salter osteotomy or Pemberton acetabuloplasty.
Forty-two patients who underwent either a Salter or Pemberton procedure at one institution between January 1981 and December 2000 and were available for followup at least 10 years later (mean, 18 years; range, 12–28 years) were evaluated retrospectively. This represented 12% of the Salter and Pemberton procedures performed in patients between 12 and 36 months old at our institution during the study period. We measured vertical-center-anterior margin angle, anterior acetabular head index, and weightbearing zone acetabular index, and we made comparisons using the radiographic parameter ratio (the division of each radiographic measurement of the operative side by that of the nonoperated side). All patients completed SF-36 and Harris hip score questionnaires at followup.
In the Salter group, there were no differences in vertical-center-anterior margin angle, anterior acetabular head index, or weightbearing zone acetabular index. In the Pemberton group, there was no difference in vertical-center-anterior margin angle or anterior acetabular head index, but the weightbearing zone acetabular index decreased, suggesting increased anterior acetabular coverage (surgically treated side, 6 [95% CI, 4.84, 7.16]; nonoperated side, 12 [95% CI, 10.07, 13.39]; p < 0.001). Compared with that in the Salter group, the weightbearing zone acetabular index ratio was smaller in the Pemberton group, which means more acquired anterior coverage after a Pemberton acetabuloplasty (Salter procedure, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.70, 1.17], Pemberton procedure, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40, 0.65]; p < 0.001). Three patients in the Pemberton group had an anterior impingement sign at followup, whereas none in the Salter group did. The SF-36 and Harris hip scores were good and showed no differences between the two groups.
Our study suggests the weightbearing zone acetabular index on false profile radiographs of the hip, a parameter focusing on morphologic features of the anterior acetabulum, decreased after Pemberton acetabuloplasty compared with the nonoperated side and after the Salter acetabuloplasty. This suggests that by modifying the shape of the acetabulum with a hinge in the triradiate cartilage, a Pemberton acetabuloplasty may result in increasing acetabular anterior coverage and the risk of hip impingement. However, the functional results with at least 10 years followup were good and similar for both procedures.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Barnes JR, Thomas SR, Wedge J. Acetabular coverage after innominate osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:530–533. CrossRef
- Chosa E, Tajima N. Anterior acetabular head index of the hip on false-profile views: new index of anterior acetabular cover. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:826–829.
- Dora C, Mascard E, Mladenov K, Seringe R. Retroversion of the acetabular dome after Salter and triple pelvic osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11:34–40.
- Hefti F. Spherical assessment of the hip on standard AP radiographs: a simple method for the measurement of the contact area between acetabulum and femoral head and of acetabular orientation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:797–805. CrossRef
- Kalamchi A, MacEwen GD. Avascular necrosis following treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:876–888.
- Konishi N, Mieno T. Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph: a new computerized technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1318–1333.
- Lequesne M, Bellaiche L. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: an update. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79:249–255. CrossRef
- Lequesne MG, Laredo JD. The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position: contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:676–681. CrossRef
- Pemberton PA. Pericapsular osteotomy of the ilium for treatment of congenital subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;47:65–86.
- Robb CA, Datta A, Nayeemuddin M, Bache CE. Assessment of acetabular retroversion following long term review of Salter’s osteotomy. Hip Int. 2009;19:8–12.
- Salter RB. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and suluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:518–539.
- Takashi S, Hattori T, Konishi N, Iwata H. Acetabular development after Salter’s innominate osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip: evaluation by three-dimensional quantitative method. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:802–806.
- Comparison of Acetabular Anterior Coverage After Salter Osteotomy and Pemberton Acetabuloplasty: A Long-term Followup
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 472, Issue 3 , pp 1001-1009
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New Taipei City Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3. Center for Evidence Based Medicine, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical Unversity, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan