Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Charles A. Reitman MD
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis is common. Surgery for it, when indicated, has traditionally been performed as a posterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation, and relief of symptoms generally results. More recently, some spine surgeons have advocated for less-invasive approaches to the treatment of this condition. This has theoretical advantages, and it is very marketable and popular with the lay population. While the outcomes appear to be good with either technique, as new technology is introduced, it is important to compare the advantages, safety, and expenses of the new approaches to the more established techniques.
To help address some of these issues, I have invited two well-known experts in the field to discuss and defend their preferences. Jeff Fischgrund MD is a faculty member at William Beaumont Hospital and an authority on this subject, having authored several of the sentinel papers on posterior decompression and fusion with and without instrumentation.
- Abdu WA, Lurie JD, Spratt KF, Tosteson AN, Zhao A, Tosteson TD, Longley M, Boden SD, Emery S, Weinstein JM. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila, Pa 1976). 2009;34:2351–2360.
- Kornblum M, Fischgrund JS. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine (Phila, PA 1976). 2004;29:726–734.
- Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Barnawi A, Fessler RG. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci. 2011;55:259–264.
- Lucio JC, Vanconia RB, DeLuzio KJ, Lehmen JA, Rodgers JA, Rodgers W. Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5–65–74.
- Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:829–835. CrossRef
- Montgomery DM, Fischgrund JS: Postural reduction of spondylolisthesis on the operating room table: A prospective study. J Spinal Dis. 1994;7:167–172. CrossRef
- Parker SL, Adogwa O, Bydon A, Chen J, McGirt MJ. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive vs. open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years. World Neurosurgery. 2011;1:178–184.
- Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C. Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions. Spine (Phila, Pa 1976). 2011;36:2084–2088.
- Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int. 2010;1:12. CrossRef
- Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Camissa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Ericco TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2257–2270. CrossRef
- Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 471, Issue 10 , pp 3082-3087
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6620 Main Street, Suite 1325, Houston, TX, 77030, USA