Variations in the Use of Diagnostic Criteria for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Wide variation exists in reported prevalence estimates and management standards of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Discrepancies in diagnosticians’ opinions may explain some of this variation.
We sought to determine (1) the consistency with which pediatric orthopaedic surgeons rate the importance of diagnostic criteria for DDH, and (2) whether there were geographic differences in how the diagnostic criteria were rated by surgeons.
One hundred ninety-seven of 220 members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society and 100 of 148 members of the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery treating children with DDH participated in this cross-sectional study across 35 countries (15 regions). Each rated 37 items in four domains that specialists previously had identified as the most important features associated with DDH in early infancy. We determined consistency using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; two-way random-effects model) interpreted as poor (0–0.40), acceptable (0.41–0.74), or good (≥ 0.75).
Poor consistency among surgeons was found in rating the 37 diagnostic criteria (ICC, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24–0.45). Consistency was poor for three domains (patient characteristics/history: ICC, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.58; ultrasound: ICC, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.52; radiography: ICC, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12–0.95) and acceptable for one (clinical examination: ICC, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33–0.73). Surgeons in particular regions appeared to have a concept of DDH diagnosis that distinguished them from specialists of other regions; consistency in eight regions was greater (ICC ≥ 0.40) than consistency among all 15 regions.
The consistency of specialists in rating diagnostic criteria for DDH was lower than expected, and there was considerable geographic variation in terms of how specialists assigned importance ratings of the diagnostic criteria; these findings are somewhat counterintuitive, given the frequency with which this condition is diagnosed. These inconsistencies could explain, partly, the widely differing prevalence estimates and management standards of DDH.
- Bartlett MS. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1937;160:268–282. CrossRef
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. CrossRef
- Bouma BJ, van der Meulen JH, van den Brink RB, Smidts A, Cheriex EC, Hamer HP, Arnold AE, Zwinderman AH, Lie KI, Tijssen JG. Validity of conjoint analysis to study clinical decision making in elderly patients with aortic stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:815–823. CrossRef
- Bridges JF, Joy SM, Gallego G, Kudo M, Ye SL, Han KH, Cheng AL, Blauvelt BM. Needs for hepatocellular carcinoma control policy in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12:2585–2591.
- Clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2000;105:896–905.
- Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334. CrossRef
- Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000.
- Eisenberg JM. Physician utilization: the state of research about physicians’ practice patterns. Med Care. 1985;23:461–483. CrossRef
- Epstein AM, McNeil BJ. Relationship beliefs and behavior in test ordering. Am J Med. 1986;80:865–870. CrossRef
- Feinstein A. Clinimetrics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1987.
- Franks P, Williams GC, Zwanziger J, Mooney C, Sorbero M. Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:163–168. CrossRef
- Gardiner HM, Dunn PM. Controlled trial of immediate splinting versus ultrasonographic surveillance in congenitally dislocatable hips. Lancet. 1990;336:1553–1556. CrossRef
- Graham B, Dvali L, Regehr G, Wright JG. Variations in diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome among Ontario specialists. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:8–13. CrossRef
- Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1150–1156. CrossRef
- Holen KJ, Tegnander A, Bredland T, Johansen OJ, Saether OD, Eik-Nes SH, Terjesen T. Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15,529 newborn infants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:886–890. CrossRef
- Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Kreder H, Moroni A, Richardson M, Walter SD, Norman GR, Guyatt GH. Evaluating agreement: conducting a reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:99–106. CrossRef
- Leck I. Congenital dislocation of the hip. In: Wald N, Leck I, eds. Antenatal and Neonatal Screening. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000:398–424. CrossRef
- Marks DS, Clegg J, al-Chalabi AN. Routine ultrasound screening for neonatal hip instability: can it abolish late-presenting congenital dislocation of the hip? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:534–538.
- McNeil BJ. Shattuck Lecture: hidden barriers to improvement in the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1612–1620. CrossRef
- Moskowitz AJ, Kuipers BJ, Kassirer JP. Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions: a cognitive science approach. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:435–449. CrossRef
- Patel H. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ. 2001;164:1669–1677.
- Portney LG, Watkins MP. Statistical measures of reliability. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications in Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Princeton-Hall; 2000.
- Roposch A, Liu LQ, Hefti F, Clarke NM, Wedge JH. Standardized diagnostic criteria for developmental dysplasia of the hip in early infancy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3451–3461. CrossRef
- Roposch A, Moreau NM, Uleryk E, Doria AS. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy for US. Radiology. 2006;241:854–860. CrossRef
- Roposch A, Wright JG. Increased diagnostic information and understanding disease: uncertainty in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia. Radiology. 2007;242:355–359. CrossRef
- Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics. 1994;94:47–52.
- Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428. CrossRef
- Tegnander A, Holen KJ, Terjesen T. The natural history of hip abnormalities detected by ultrasound in clinically normal newborns: a 6–8 year radiographic follow-up study of 93 children. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:335–337. CrossRef
- Terjesen T, Bredland T, Berg V. Ultrasound for hip assessment in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:767–773.
- von Kries R, Ihme N, Oberle D, Lorani A, Stark R, Altenhofen L, Niethard FU. Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany. Lancet. 2003;362:1883–1887. CrossRef
- Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–110. CrossRef
- Woolacott NF, Puhan MA, Steurer J, Kleijnen J. Ultrasonography in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns: systematic review. BMJ. 2005;330:1413. CrossRef
- Variations in the Use of Diagnostic Criteria for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 471, Issue 6 , pp 1946-1954
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 3EH, UK
- 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK