Patient-specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Required Frequent Surgeon-directed Changes
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Patient-specific instrumentation potentially improves surgical precision and decreases operative time in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but there is little supporting data to confirm this presumption.
We asked whether patient-specific instrumentation would require infrequent intraoperative changes to replicate a single surgeon’s preferences during TKA and whether patient-specific instrumentation guides would fit securely.
We prospectively evaluated the plan and surgery in 60 patients treated with 66 TKAs performed with patient-specific instrumentation and recorded any changes. A subset of six postoperative radiographic changes to the femoral and tibial components (implant size, coronal and sagittal alignment) was analyzed to determine if surgeon intervention was beneficial. Each guide was evaluated to determine fit. We compared patient demographics and implant sizing in the patient-specific instrumentation group with a control group in which traditional instrumentation was used.
We recorded 161 intraoperative changes in 66 knee arthroplasties (2.4 changes/knee) performed with patient-specific instrumentation. The predetermined implant size was changed intraoperatively in 77% of femurs and 53% of tibias. We identified a subset of 95 intraoperative changes that could be radiographically evaluated to determine if our changes were an improvement or detriment to reaching goal alignment. Eighty-two of the 95 changes (86%) made by the surgeon were an improvement to the recommended alignment or size of patient-specific instrumentation. The guide did not fit securely on eight femurs (12%) and three tibias (5%). Tourniquet time and blood loss were not improved with patient-specific instrumentation.
We caution surgeons against blind acceptance of patient-specific instrumentation technology without supportive data.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;216:151–158.
- Fehring TK, Odum SM, Troyer JL, Iorio R, Kurtz SM, Lau EC. Joint replacement access in 2016: a supply side crisis. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1175–1181. CrossRef
- Hariri S, York SC, O’Connor MI, Parsley BS, McCarthy JC. A resident survey study of orthopedic fellowship specialty decision making and views on arthroplasty as a career. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:961–968;e961. CrossRef
- Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857–863. CrossRef
- Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:26–29. CrossRef
- Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487–1497. CrossRef
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785. CrossRef
- Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:580–584. CrossRef
- Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Bonutti PM. Surgeon perceptions regarding custom-fit positioning technology for total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:348–351.
- Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudsen HM, Hvid I, Jensen J. Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up report on 348 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:7–10. CrossRef
- NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003;20:1–34.
- Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18–25. CrossRef
- Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94–102.
- Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10–17. CrossRef
- Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop. 2008;33:1571–1575. CrossRef
- Watters TS, Mather RC 3rd, Browne JA, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Bolognesi MP. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20:112–116.
- Patient-specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Required Frequent Surgeon-directed Changes
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 471, Issue 1 , pp 169-174
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
- 2. University of Utah, University Orthopaedic Center, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA