Radiographic Features Associated With Differing Impinging Hip Morphologies With Special Attention to Coxa Profunda
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Combined with clinical examination and MRI, radiographs have been mainstays in the management femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Because hip morphology often portends intraoperative damage, radiographic features should inform surgical management.
We determined (1) the radiographic features of the various hip morphologies; (2) the prevalence of radiographic coxa profunda in each group; (3) the radiographic differences between hips with and without coxa profunda; and (4) its sensitivity and specificity as a measure of global acetabular overcoverage.
We reviewed preoperative radiographs and operative notes of 144 hips that underwent surgical dislocation and correction for FAI between August 2002 and February 2011. Hips were divided into four FAI subtypes by radiographic analysis (cam, global overcoverage, retroversion, and combined) and three subtypes (cam, pincer, or combined) by intraarticular pathology. Standard radiographic measurements were performed, and we introduce a novel measurement that assesses femoral head coverage.
We found differences in median Angle of Sharp, femoral head-neck angle, and median roof length (and its subset) among the FAI morphologies. The prevalence of radiographic coxa profunda was 48% in cam hips, 85% in global overcoverage hips, 66% in retroverted hips, and 32% in combined hips. The sensitivity and specificity of radiographic coxa profunda as a measure of global overcoverage was 75% (95% CI, 0.62–0.85) and 62% (95% CI, 0.51–0.73), respectively.
We found major differences in radiographic measurements between FAI morphologies. Radiographic coxa profunda was poorly specific for global overcoverage. Measurement of roof length and ratio should be used to determine the morphology of the impinging hip.
Level of Evidence
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Armbuster, TG, Guerra, JJ, Resnick, D, Goergen, TG, Feingold, ML, Niwayama, G, Danzig, LA (1978) The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology. 128: pp. 1-10
- Beck, M, Kalhor, M, Leunig, M, Ganz, R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87: pp. 1012-1018 CrossRef
- Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 57: pp. 289-300
- Clohisy, JC, Carlisle, JC, Beaule, PE, Kim, YJ, Trousdale, RT, Sierra, RJ, Leuiq, M, Schoenecker, PL, Millis, MB (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: pp. 47-66 CrossRef
- Clohisy, JC, Carlisle, JC, Trousdale, R, Kim, YJ, Beaule, PE, Morgan, P, Steger-May, K, Schoenecker, PL, Millis, M (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 666-675 CrossRef
- Eijer, H, Leunig, M, Mahomed, MN, Ganz, R (2001) Crosstable lateral radiograph for screening of anterior femoral head–neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 11: pp. 37-41
- Ganz, R, Gill, TJ, Gautier, E, Ganz, K, Krugel, N, Berlemann, U (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 83: pp. 1119-1124 CrossRef
- Ganz, R, Parvizi, J, Beck, M, Leunig, M, Notzli, H, Siebenrock, KA (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 417: pp. 112-120
- Hooper, JC, Jones, EW (1971) Primary protrusion of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 53: pp. 23-29
- Kutty S, Schneider P, Faris P, Kiefer G, Frizzell B, Park R, Powell JN. Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop. 2011 Jul 1 [Epub ahead of print].
- Leunig, M, Nho, SJ, Turchetto, L, Ganz, R (2009) Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 2241-2250 CrossRef
- Parvizi, J, Leunig, M, Ganz, R (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 15: pp. 561-570
- R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008. Available at: www.R-project.org. Accessed June 13, 2012.
- Reynolds, D, Lucas, J, Klaue, K (1999) Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 81: pp. 281-288 CrossRef
- Ruelle, M, Dubois, JL (1962) [The protrusive malformation and its arthroscopic complication. I. Radiological and clinical symptoms] Etiopathogenesis [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 29: pp. 476-489
- Schoenecker, PL, Clohisy, JC, Millis, MB, Wenger, DR (2011) Surgical management of the problematic hip in adolescent and young adult patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 19: pp. 275-286
- Siebenrock, KA, Kalbermatten, DF, Ganz, R (2003) Effect of pelvic inclination on determination of acetabular retroversion: a study on cadaver pelves. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 407: pp. 241-248 CrossRef
- Sierra, RJ, Trousdale, RT, Ganz, R, Leunig, M (2008) Hip disease in the young, active patient: evaluation and nonarthroplasty surgical options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16: pp. 689-703
- Tannast, M, Murphy, SB, Langlotz, F, Anderson, SE, Siebenrock, KA (2006) Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays: a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol. 35: pp. 149-155 CrossRef
- Radiographic Features Associated With Differing Impinging Hip Morphologies With Special Attention to Coxa Profunda
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 470, Issue 12 , pp 3368-3374
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors