Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 470, Issue 12, pp 3375–3382

Coxa Profunda: Is the Deep Acetabulum Overcovered?

  • Lucas A. Anderson
  • Ashley L. Kapron
  • Stephen K. Aoki
  • Christopher L. Peters
Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Hip Preservation Surgery

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2509-y

Cite this article as:
Anderson, L.A., Kapron, A.L., Aoki, S.K. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 470: 3375. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2509-y

Abstract

Background

Coxa profunda, or a deep acetabular socket, is often used to diagnose pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographically, coxa profunda is the finding of an acetabular fossa medial to the ilioischial line. However, the relative position of the acetabular fossa to the pelvis may not be indicative of acetabular coverage.

Questions/purposes

We therefore determined the incidence of coxa profunda and evaluated associations between coxa profunda and other radiographic parameters of acetabular coverage commonly used to diagnose pincer FAI and acetabular dysplasia.

Methods

We evaluated the radiographs of three cohorts for coxa profunda, lateral center edge (LCE) angle, acetabular index, posterior wall sign, and crossover sign. Data from 67 collegiate football players were collected prospectively (Cohort 1). We identified two patient cohorts through retrospective review of all 179 hips undergoing hip preservation surgery from 2002 to 2008 (83 periacetabular osteotomies [Cohort 2] and 96 surgical dislocation and osteochondroplasties [Cohort 3]).

Results

In all three cohorts, we detected no difference in the LCE angle or acetabular index between hips with and without coxa profunda. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage measured by LCE angle (−18° to 60°) and acetabular orientation determined by the crossover sign.

Conclusions

Coxa profunda was a common radiographic finding in both symptomatic patients and asymptomatic football players. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage and was not associated with an overcovered acetabulum. We conclude coxa profunda is unrelated to overcoverage and suggest its use in diagnosis of pincer FAI be abandoned in favor of other determinants of focal or general overcoverage.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas A. Anderson
    • 1
  • Ashley L. Kapron
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen K. Aoki
    • 1
  • Christopher L. Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiomechanicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA