Reliability of Scapular Classification in Examination of Professional Baseball Players
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Ellenbecker, T.S., Ben Kibler, W., Bailie, D.S. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 470: 1540. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2216-0
- 595 Downloads
Clinically evaluating the scapulothoracic joint is challenging. To identify scapular dyskinesis, clinicians typically observe scapular motion and congruence during self-directed upper extremity movements. However, it is unclear whether this method is reliable.
We therefore determined the interrater reliability of a scapular classification system in the examination of professional baseball players.
Seventy-one healthy uninjured professional baseball players between the ages of 18 and 32 years volunteered to participate. We used a digital video camera to film five repetitions of scapular plane elevation while holding a 2-pound weight. Four examiners then independently classified the motions on video into one of four types. Interrater reliability analysis using the kappa (k) statistic was performed for: (1) classifying each scapula into one of the four types; (2) classifying each scapula as being abnormal (Types I–III) or normal (Type IV); and (3) classifying both scapula as both being symmetric (both normal or both abnormal) or asymmetric (one normal, one abnormal).
We found low reliability for all analyses. In classifying each scapula as one of the four types, reliability was k = 0.245 for the left limb and k = 0.186 for the right limb. When considering the dichotomous classifications (abnormal versus normal), reliability was k = 0.264 for left and k = 0.157 for right. For bilateral symmetry/asymmetric, reliability was k = 0.084.
We found low reliability of visual observation and classification of scapular movement.
Current evaluation strategies for evaluating subtle scapular abnormalities are limited.
Level of Evidence
Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.