Using Financial Incentives to Improve Value in Orthopaedics
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A variety of reforms to traditional approaches to provider payment and benefit design are being implemented in the United States. There is increasing interest in applying these financial incentives to orthopaedics, although it is unclear whether and to what extent they have been implemented and whether they increase quality or reduce costs.
We reviewed and discussed physician- and patient-oriented financial incentives being implemented in orthopaedics, key challenges, and prerequisites to payment reform and value-driven payment policy in orthopaedics.
We searched the MEDLINE database using as search terms various provider payment and consumer incentive models. We retrieved a total of 169 articles; none of these studies met the inclusion criteria. For incentive models known to the authors to be in use in orthopaedics but for which no peer-reviewed literature was found, we searched Google for further information.
Provider financial incentives reviewed include payments for reporting, performance, and patient safety and episode payment. Patient incentives include tiered networks, value-based benefit design, reference pricing, and value-based purchasing. Reform of financial incentives for orthopaedic surgery is challenged by (1) lack of a payment/incentive model that has demonstrated reductions in cost trends and (2) the complex interrelation of current pay schemes in today’s fragmented environment. Prerequisites to reform include (1) a reliable and complete data infrastructure; (2) new business structures to support cost sharing; and (3) a retooling of patient expectations.
There is insufficient literature reporting the effects of various financial incentive models under implementation in orthopaedics to know whether they increase quality or reduce costs. National concerns about cost will continue to drive experimentation, and all anticipated innovations will require improved collaboration and data collection and reporting.
- Aetna Inc. Aexcel® Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network Methodology Guide. Available at: http://www.aetna.com/plansandproducts/health/medical/Aexcel_Methodology_v3_2010.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Orthopaedic practice in the U.S. 2008. 2009. Available at: http://www3.aaos.org/product/productpage.cfm?code=05151. Accessed September 6, 2011.
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). 2010. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/research/committee/evidence/pqri_measures.asp. Accessed February 21, 2011.
- Bach, PB (2008) Cost sharing for health care—whose skin? Which game?. N Engl J Med. 358: pp. 411-413 CrossRef
- Bhattacharyya, T, Freiberg, AA, Mehta, P, Katz, JN, Ferris, T (2009) Measuring the report card: the validity of pay-for-performance metrics in orthopedic surgery. Health Aff (Millwood) 28: pp. 526-532 CrossRef
- Bhattacharyya, T, Mehta, P, Freiberg, AA (2008) Hospital characteristics associated with success in a pay-for-performance program in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: pp. 1240-1243 CrossRef
- Boxall A. Should we expand the use of pay-for-performance in health care? 2009. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/rp/2009-10/10rp12.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2011.
- Bozic, KJ, Chiu, V (2008) Quality measurement and public reporting in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 23: pp. 146-149 CrossRef
- Bozic, KJ, Smith, AR, Mauerhan, DR (2007) Pay-for-performance in orthopedics: implications for clinical practice. J Arthroplasty. 22: pp. 8-12 CrossRef
- CalPERS. 2011 premium comparison. 2011. Available at: http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/board-cal-agenda/agendas/hbc/201006/item-3a-attach-1.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- Casale A, Michalak DM. ProvenCare CAB. 2010. Available at: http://www.geisinger.org/info/innov_conf/careDeliveryConf/august2010_conf_presentations/pcacute.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- Casale, AS, Paulus, RA, Selna, MJ, Doll, MC, Bothe, AE, McKinley, KE, Berry, SA, Davis, DE, Gilfillan, RJ, Hamory, BH, Steele, GD (2007) “ProvenCareSM”: a provider-driven pay for performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Ann Surg. 246: pp. 613-623 CrossRef
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation. Partnership for Patients. 2011. Available at: http://innovations.cms.gov/areas-of-focus/patient-care-models/partnerships-for-patients/. Accessed August 4, 2011.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Hospital-acquired conditions (present on admission indicator). 2008. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/HospitalAcqCond/06_Hospital-Acquired_Conditions.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed July 2011.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Decision memo for surgery on the wrong patient. 2009. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=221&ver=17&NcaName=Surgery+on+the+Wrong+Patient&bc=BEAAAAAAEAAA&&fromdb=true. Accessed July 2011.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare demonstrations illustrate benefits in paying for quality health care. 2010. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=3882&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=1%2C+2%2C+3%2C+4%2C+5&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date. Accessed January 8, 2011.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measures List. 2010. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/PQRS/Downloads/2011_PhysQualRptg_MeasuresList_033111.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2011.
- Chernew, ME, Newhouse, JP (2008) What does the RAND Health Insurance Experiment tell us about the impact of patient cost sharing on health outcomes?. Am J Manag Care. 14: pp. 412-414
- Christianson, JB, Leatherman, S, Sutherland, K (2008) Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev. 65: pp. 5S-35S CrossRef
- CJRR Steering Committee. The California Joint Replacement Registry: selecting a tool for evaluating patient reported outcomes (draft) 2010. Available at: http://www.caljrr.org/pdf/PatientReportedOutcomesBrief.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2011.
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy. Recommendations of the Special Commission on the Health Care Payment System. 2009. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/dhcfp/paymentcommission. Accessed February 15, 2011.
- Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project. Patient charter for physician performance measurement, reporting and tiering program: ensuring transparency, fairness and independent review. 2008. Available at: http://healthcaredisclosure.org/docs/files/PatientCharter.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- Cutler, D (2010) Analysis & commentary: how health care reform must bend cost curve. Health Aff (Millwood) 29: pp. 1131-1135 CrossRef
- Darr, K (2003) The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposal to pay for performance. Hosp Top. 81: pp. 30-32
- Brantes, F, Rosenthal, MB, Painter, M (2009) Building a bridge from fragmentation to accountability—the Prometheus Payment model. N Engl J Med. 361: pp. 1033-1036 CrossRef
- Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Value-Based Purchasing Program. 2011. Available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-01-13/pdf/2011-454.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2011.
- Dudley RA, Rosenthal MB. Pay for performance: a decision guide for purchasers (final contract report) 2006. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/p4pguide.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2011.
- Fairman, KA, Curtiss, FR (2010) Clinical quality indicators and provider financial incentives: does money matter?. J Manag Care Pharm. 16: pp. 360-366
- Fendrick, AM, Chernew, ME (2006) Value-based insurance design: aligning incentives to bridge the divide between quality improvement and cost containment. Am J Manag Care. 12: pp. SP5-SP10
- Fendrick, AM, Chernew, ME (2009) Value based insurance design: maintaining a focus on health in an era of cost containment. Am J Manag Care. 15: pp. 338-343
- Fendrick, AM, Chernew, ME, Levi, GW (2009) Value-based insurance design: embracing value over cost alone. Am J Manag Care. 15: pp. S277-S283
- Gibson, TB, Ozminkowski, RJ, Goetzel, RZ (2005) The effects of prescription drug cost sharing: a review of the evidence. Am J Manag Care. 11: pp. 730-740
- Goodfellow, JW, O’Connor, JJ, Murray, DW (2010) A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 92: pp. 1628-1631 CrossRef
- Greene, SE, Nash, DB (2009) Pay for performance: an overview of the literature. Am J Med Qual. 24: pp. 140-163 CrossRef
- Griner, PF (2010) Payment reform and the mission of academic medical centers. N Engl J Med. 363: pp. 1784-1786 CrossRef
- Hawn, MT, Itani, KM, Gray, SH, Vick, CC, Henderson, W, Houston, TK (2008) Association of timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics for major surgical procedures and surgical site infection. J Am Coll Surg. 206: pp. 814-819 CrossRef
- Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute. Prometheus in practice. 2010. Available at: http://www.prometheuspayment.org/Documents/Prometheus-Karen-Insert-L4.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- Hsu, J, Price, M, Huang, J, Brand, R, Fung, V, Hui, R, Fireman, B, Newhouse, JP, Selby, JV (2006) Unintended consequences of caps on Medicare drug benefits. N Engl J Med. 354: pp. 2349-2359 CrossRef
- Huskamp, HA, Deverka, PA, Epstein, AM, Epstein, RS, McGuigan, KA, Frank, RG (2003) The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending. N Engl J Med. 349: pp. 2224-2232 CrossRef
- Hussey, PS, Eibner, C, Ridgely, MS, McGlynn, EA (2009) Controlling U.S. health care spending—separating promising from unpromising approaches. N Engl J Med 361: pp. 2109-2111 CrossRef
- Iglehart, JK (2002) Changing health insurance trends. N Engl J Med. 347: pp. 956-962 CrossRef
- Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Learning healthcare system concepts v. 2008. Annual report. 2008. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Quality/VSRT/Learning%20Healthcare%20System%20Concepts%20v2008.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2011.
- Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA). Value-based purchasing of medical devices. 2010. Available at: http://www.iha.org/medical_device_vbp.html. Accessed January 2011.
- Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA). IHA Bundled Episode Payment and Gainsharing Demonstration: Project Description March 14, 2011. 2011. Available at: http://www.iha.org/pdfs_documents/BundledEpisodePaymentPilotProjectDescription_March2011.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2011.
- Kapowich, JM (2010) Oregon’s test of value-based insurance design in coverage for state workers. Health Aff (Millwood) 29: pp. 2028-2032 CrossRef
- Lansky, D, Milstein, A (2009) Quality measurement in orthopaedics: the purchasers’ view. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 2548-2555 CrossRef
- Lerner, JC, Fox, DM, Nelson, T, Reiss, JB (2008) The consequence of secret prices: the politics of physician preference items. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: pp. 1560-1565 CrossRef
- Mager, DE, Cox, ER (2007) Relationship between generic and preferred-brand prescription copayment differentials and generic fill rate. Am J Manag Care. 13: pp. 347-352
- Marcus, RE, Zenty, TF, Adelman, HG (2009) Aligning incentives in orthopaedics: opportunities and challenges—the Case Medical Center experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 2525-2534 CrossRef
- Medicare. Physician Compare Web site. 2011. Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/find-a-doctor/provider-search.aspx. Accessed July 2011.
- Mehrotra, A, Damberg, CL, Sorbero, ME, Teleki, SS (2009) Pay for performance in the hospital setting: what is the state of the evidence?. Am J Med Qual. 24: pp. 19-28 CrossRef
- Porter, ME (2009) A strategy for health care reform—toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med. 361: pp. 109-112 CrossRef
- Premier Healthcare Alliance. Hospitals in demonstration project continue to improve patient outcomes, provide lessons learned for health reform value-based purchasing program. 2010. Available at: http://www.premierinc.com/about/news/10-dec/hqid121710.jsp. Accessed July 12, 2011.
- Ranawat, AS, Koenig, JH, Thomas, AJ, Krna, CD, Shapiro, LA (2009) Aligning physician and hospital incentives: the approach at hospital for special surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 2535-2541 CrossRef
- Satin, DJ, Miles, J (2009) Performance-based bundled payments: potential benefits and burdens. Minn Med. 92: pp. 33-35
- Soohoo, NF, Correa, B, Pandarinath, R (2009) Pitfalls of using performance measures to evaluate the quality of hip fracture care. Orthopedics. 32: pp. 84
- Soohoo, NF, Lieberman, JR, Farng, E, Park, S, Jain, S, Ko, CY (2009) Perioperative quality-of-care measures for patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 19: pp. 249-253
- Trivedi, AN, Rakowski, W, Ayanian, JZ (2008) Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans. N Engl J Med. 358: pp. 375-383 CrossRef
- US Congress. Section 3001, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. HR 3590. 2010. Available at: http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act-as-passed.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2011.
- Herck, P, Smedt, D, Annemans, L, Remmen, R, Rosenthal, MB, Sermeus, W (2010) Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 10: pp. 247 CrossRef
- Willensky, GR (2010) Health economics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 153: pp. 179-193
- Wilson, NA, Ranawat, A, Nunley, R, Bozic, KJ (2009) Executive summary: aligning stakeholder incentives in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 2521-2524 CrossRef
- Wilson, NA, Schneller, ES, Montgomery, K, Bozic, KJ (2008) Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: pp. 1587-1598 CrossRef
- Zeber, JE, Grazier, KL, Valenstein, M, Blow, FC, Lantz, PM (2007) Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia. Am J Manag Care. 13: pp. 335-346
- Using Financial Incentives to Improve Value in Orthopaedics
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 470, Issue 4 , pp 1027-1037
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Pacific Business Group on Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
- 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus, MU 320W, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0728, USA
- 4. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA