Computer-assisted Navigation in Bone Tumor Surgery: Seamless Workflow Model and Evolution of Technique
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Computer-assisted navigation was recently introduced to aid the resection of musculoskeletal tumors. However, it has not always been possible to directly navigate the osteotomy with real-time manipulation of available surgical tools. Registration techniques vary, although most existing systems use some form of surface matching.
We developed and evaluated a workflow model of computer-assisted bone tumor surgery and evaluated (1) the applicability of currently available software to different bones; (2) the accuracy of the navigated excision; and (3) the accuracy of a new registration technique of fluoro-CT matching.
Our workflow involved detailed preoperative planning with CT-MRI image fusion, three-dimensional mapping of the tumor, and planning of the resection plane. Using the workflow model, we reviewed 15 navigation procedures in 12 patients, including four with joint-saving resections and three with custom implant reconstructions. Intraoperatively, registration was performed with either paired points and surface matching (Group 1, n = 10) or a new technique of fluoro-CT image matching (Group 2, n = 5). All osteotomies were performed under direct computer navigation. Postoperatively, each case was evaluated for histologic margin and gross measurement of the achieved surgical margin.
The margins were free from tumor in all resected specimens. In the Group 1 procedures, the correlation between preoperative planned margins and actual achieved margins was 0.631, whereas in Group 2 procedures (fluoro-CT matching), the correlation was 0.985.
Our findings suggest computer-assisted navigation is accurate and useful for bone tumor surgery. The new registration technique using fluoro-CT matching may allow more accurate resection of margins.
- Chauhan, SK, Scott, RG, Breidahl, W, Beaver, RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomized prospective trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 86: pp. 372-377 CrossRef
- Cho, HS, Kang, HG, Kim, HS, Han, I (2008) Computer-assisted sacral tumor resection. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90: pp. 1561-1566 CrossRef
- Cho, HS, Oh, JH, Han, I, Kim, HS (2009) Joint-preserving limb salvage surgery under navigation guidance. J. Surg. Oncol. 100: pp. 227-232 CrossRef
- Grutzner, PA, Suhm, N (2004) Computer aided long bone fracture treatment. Injury. 35: pp. S-A57-S-A64
- Hufner, T, Kfuri, M, Galalski, M, Bastian, L, Loss, M, Pohlemann, T, Krettek, C (2004) New indications for computer-assisted surgery tumor resection in the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 426: pp. 219-225 CrossRef
- Krettek, C, Geerling, J, Bastian, L, Citak, M, Rucker, F, Kendoff, D, Hufner, T (2004) Computer aided tumor resection in the pelvis. Injury. 35: pp. S-A79-S-A83
- Richter, M, Cakir, B, Schmidt, R (2005) Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine.(Phila Pa 1976). 30: pp. 2280-2287
- Schramm, A, Suarez-Cunqueiro, MM, Barth, EL, Essig, H, Bormann, KH, Kokemueller, H, Rücker, M, Gellrich, NC (2008) Computer-assisted navigation in craniomaxillofacial tumors. J Craniofac Surg. 19: pp. 1067-1074 CrossRef
- Wong, KC, Kumta, SM, Chiu, KH, Antonio, GE, Unwin, P, Leung, KS (2007) Precision bone tumor resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 89: pp. 943-947 CrossRef
- Computer-assisted Navigation in Bone Tumor Surgery: Seamless Workflow Model and Evolution of Technique
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 468, Issue 11 , pp 2985-2991
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors