Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 10, pp 2646–2663

Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: Aligning Operations With Information Technology

  • Elizabeth W. Paxton
  • Maria C. S. Inacio
  • Monti Khatod
  • Eric J. Yue
  • Robert S. Namba
Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Health Informatics

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9

Cite this article as:
Paxton, E.W., Inacio, M.C.S., Khatod, M. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 468: 2646. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9

Abstract

Background

A Total Joint Replacement Registry was developed in a large community-based practice to track implant utilization, monitor revisions and complications, identify patients during recalls and advisories, and provide feedback on clinical practices.

Questions/purposes

We describe the development, implementation, and integration of this Total Joint Replacement Registry, highlighting critical steps in aligning information technology and operations.

Methods

The primary Total Joint Replacement Registry data source consists of standardized electronic health record forms developed by consensus. The Total Joint Replacement Registry forms are integrated into the clinical workflow (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and produce a standardized progress note for electronic health record documentation. Secondary data are extracted from other electronic data sources using standard terminologies (ie, ICD-9 codes) to supplement the Total Joint Replacement Registry forms. Electronic screening algorithms are applied to identify complications, in combination with chart review validation and quality control mechanisms.

Results

Three hundred fifty surgeons voluntarily contribute to the registry with 90% participation. The registry has been used for implant recalls and advisories, contract decision making, and identification of patients at risk for revisions (eg, younger patients having total knee arthroplasty). Tracking of overall survival of implants influenced clinical practice, with feedback resulting in the reduction of the number of unicompartmental and uncemented knee arthroplasties performed, usage of femoral head sizes < 28 mm, and the number of minimally invasive surgical procedures performed.

Conclusions

The Total Joint Replacement Registry has effectively aligned operations with information technology and leveraged that to enhance our ability to respond to recalls and advisories as well as improve quality of care, cost-effectiveness, and create research opportunities.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth W. Paxton
    • 1
  • Maria C. S. Inacio
    • 1
  • Monti Khatod
    • 2
  • Eric J. Yue
    • 3
  • Robert S. Namba
    • 4
  1. 1.Surgical Outcomes & Analysis Unit of Clinical AnalysisKaiser PermanenteSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsKaiser PermanenteBaldwin ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsKaiser PermanenteSacramentoUSA
  4. 4.Department of OrthopaedicsKaiser PermanenteOrange CountyUSA