Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 9, pp 2333–2339

Squeaking in Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasties

  • Christina Esposito
  • William L. Walter
  • Pat Campbell
  • Anne Roques
Symposium: Complications of Hip Arthroplasty

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1344-2

Cite this article as:
Esposito, C., Walter, W.L., Campbell, P. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 468: 2333. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1344-2

Abstract

Background

While most reports of audible squeaking in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have focused on ceramic bearings, squeaking can occur in metal-on-metal bearings and may be an important clinical complication to consider during patient followup.

Questions/purposes

We retrospectively identified 10 patients with squeaking metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Methods

This study reports acetabular inclination angles and patient satisfaction, and describes two patients with squeaking resurfacings: one was revised and the other is pending revision. The minimum followup time in all 10 patients was 6 months (mean, 52 months; range, 6 to 79 months).

Results

The average time to onset was 11 months (range, 3–22 months). Hips started squeaking after bending, heavy activity, or prolonged periods of walking and the squeaking resolved within a week in all episodes. All hips except one were in the range of 45° ± 10° inclination (median, 48°). One patient who reported squeaking at 6 weeks was revised 6 years postoperatively for a cystic mass. A second patient, now 76 months postoperative, who reports squeaking weekly after walking long distances, is scheduled for revision due to high serum metal ion levels and osteolysis in DeLee and Charnley Zone 1 of the acetabulum.

Conclusions

We cannot conclude whether these complications are related to squeaking. Most patients with squeaking hip resurfacings do not appear to have an adverse response or clinical complication after 6 years. Squeaking in hip resurfacings is a short-term episode that could not be related to acetabular component inclination or decreased patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Esposito
    • 1
  • William L. Walter
    • 1
  • Pat Campbell
    • 2
  • Anne Roques
    • 3
  1. 1.Specialist Orthopaedic GroupNorth SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryJ. Vernon Luck Orthopaedic Research Center, The UCLA and Orthopaedic HospitalLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Finsbury Orthopaedics LtdSurreyUK