Minimal Incision Surgery as a Risk Factor for Early Failure of Total Hip Arthroplasty
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty (MI THA) techniques were developed to decrease postoperative pain and recovery time. Although these techniques have increased in popularity, the long-term survivorship of these procedures is unknown.
We therefore investigated whether the time to revision in our referral practice was shorter for patients who underwent primary MI THA compared to primary traditional THA.
We retrospectively reviewed 46 revision THAs performed during a 3-year period. We excluded revisions performed for infection and rerevisions. Patients with incisions less than or equal to 10 cm were defined as having had MI THA. Fifteen of the 46 patients (33%) had undergone primary MI THA. At the time of primary index THA, the mean ages of the MI and non-MI patients were 65 years and 55 years, respectively.
The mean time to revision was 1.4 years for the MI patients compared with 14.7 years for the non-MI patients. Twelve of the 15 patients having MI THA required revision within 2 years of primary THA compared to 4 of the 31 patients without MI surgery (OR = 26.5, 95% CI 4.4–160.0). There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. The most common reasons for revision in the MI THA group were intraoperative fracture and failure of femoral component osseointegration.
Our data suggest MI THA may be a risk factor for early revision surgery and the long-term survival therefore may be lower than that for non-MI surgery.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Bal, BS, Haltom, D, Aleto, T, Barrett, M (2005) Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87: pp. 2432-2438 CrossRef
- Berry, DJ, Berger, RA, Callaghan, JJ, Dorr, LD, Duwelius, PJ, Hartzband, MA, Lieberman, JR, Mears, DC (2003) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: pp. 2235-2246
- Bozic, K (2009) Single mini-incision has some perioperative advantages over standard-incision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91: pp. 1279 CrossRef
- Bozic, KJ, Beringer, D (2007) Economic considerations in minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 463: pp. 20-25
- Bozic, KJ, Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Ong, K, Vail, TP, Berry, DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91: pp. 128-133 CrossRef
- Callaghan, JJ, Bracha, P, Liu, SS, Piyaworakhun, S, Goetz, DD, Johnston, RC (2009) Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91: pp. 2617-2621 CrossRef
- Chimento, GF, Pavone, V, Sharrock, N, Kahn, B, Cahill, J, Sculco, TP (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 20: pp. 139-144 CrossRef
- Crowe, JF, Sculco, TP, Kahn, B (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: hospital cost and reimbursement analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 413: pp. 175-182 CrossRef
- Dorr, LD, Maheshwari, AV, Long, WT, Wan, Z, Sirianni, LE (2007) Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: pp. 1153-1160 CrossRef
- Hungerford, DS (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 81-82 CrossRef
- Kim, YH (2006) Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique. J Arthroplasty. 21: pp. 1092-1098 CrossRef
- Kurtz, SM, Ong, KL, Schmier, J, Mowat, F, Saleh, K, Dybvik, E, Kärrholm, J, Garellick, G, Havelin, LI, Furnes, O, Malchau, H, Lau, E (2007) Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: pp. 144-151 CrossRef
- Lubowitz, JH, Sahasrabudhe, A, Appleby, D (2007) Minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve. Orthopedics. 30: pp. 80-82
- Masonis J, Thompson C, Odum S. Safe and accurate: learning the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008;31(Suppl 2).
- Mow, CS, Woolson, ST, Ngarmukos, SG, Park, EH, Lorenz, HP (2005) Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441: pp. 80-85 CrossRef
- Ogonda, L, Wilson, R, Archbold, P, Lawlor, M, Humphreys, P, O’Brien, S, Beverland, D (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87: pp. 701-710 CrossRef
- Pagnano, MW, Hebl, J, Horlocker, T (2006) Assuring a painless total hip arthroplasty: a multimodal approach emphasizing peripheral nerve blocks. J Arthroplasty 21: pp. 80-84 CrossRef
- Pagnano, MW, Trousdale, RT, Meneghini, RM, Hanssen, AD (2008) Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: pp. 1000-1006 CrossRef
- Peters, CL, Erickson, JA, Hines, JL (2006) Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: pp. 1920-1926 CrossRef
- Pour, AE, Parvizi, J, Sharkey, PF, Hozack, WJ, Rothman, RH (2007) Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89: pp. 1920-1927 CrossRef
- Sculco, TP (2004) Minimally invasive total hip: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 78-80 CrossRef
- Seng, BE, Berend, KR, Ajluni, AF, Lombardi, AV (2009) Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am. 40: pp. 343-350 CrossRef
- Wall, SJ, Mears, SC (2008) Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23: pp. 55-58 CrossRef
- Woolson, ST, Mow, CS, Syquia, JF, Lannin, JV, Schurman, DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86: pp. 1353-1358
- Woolson, ST, Pouliot, MA, Huddleston, JI (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table. J Arthroplasty. 24: pp. 999-1005 CrossRef
- Wright, JM, Crockett, HC, Delgado, S, Lyman, S, Madsen, M, Sculco, TP (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 19: pp. 538-545 CrossRef
- Minimal Incision Surgery as a Risk Factor for Early Failure of Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 468, Issue 9 , pp 2372-2376
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion A, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA
- 2. Department of OBGYN and Reproductive Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA