Do Porous Tantalum Implants Help Preserve Bone?: Evaluation of Tibial Bone Density Surrounding Tantalum Tibial Implants in TKA
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
TKA with conventional metal-backed tibial implants subjects the tibial metaphysis to stress shielding, with resultant loss of bone density.
We hypothesized tibial bone mineral density in patients with porous tantalum (trabecular metal) tibial baseplates would (1) more closely parallel tibial bone mineral density in the nonoperative control limb and (2) be better maintained than in conventional historical controls.
Patients and Methods
We prospectively followed 41 patients (35 men, six women) 60 years of age or younger undergoing TKA with uncemented trabecular metal tibial components. Patients underwent dual-energy xray absorptiometry scans of both proximal tibiae preoperatively and at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. We determined bone mineral density in three selected regions of interest (Zone 1, between the pegs; Zone 2, beneath the pegs; Zone 3, directly below entire baseplate). Precision analysis revealed a precision error of 4% or less for each region of interest, indicating adequate power to detect bone mineral density changes of 8% or greater.
Bone mineral density percent change was different between the operative and nonoperative knees only in Zone 3 and only at 2 months. There was no change in bone mineral density in any zone in the nonoperative knee at any time. Only in Zone 3 did the bone mineral density decrease at 2 months in the operative knee.
Trabecular metal implants appear to maintain tibial bone mineral density in a parallel fashion to the nonoperative limb in this population and better than historical controls.
- Abu-Rajab, RB, Watson, WS, Walker, B, Roberts, J, Gallacher, SJ, Meek, RM (2006) Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88: pp. 606-613 CrossRef
- Bauman, RD, Lewallen, DG, Hanssen, AD (2009) Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 818-824 CrossRef
- Bellamy, N, Buchanan, WW, Goldsmith, CH, Campbell, J, Stitt, LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 15: pp. 1833-1840
- Bohr, HH, Lund, B (1987) Bone mineral density of the proximal tibia following uncemented arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2: pp. 309-312 CrossRef
- Bourne, RB, Finlay, JB (1986) The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 208: pp. 95-99
- Gioe, TJ, Novak, C, Sinner, P, Ma, W, Mehle, S (2007) Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 464: pp. 83-87
- Harrysson, OL, Robertsson, O, Nayfeh, JF (2004) Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 421: pp. 162-168 CrossRef
- Henricson, A, Linder, L, Nilsson, KG (2008) A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90: pp. 1585-1593 CrossRef
- Hedrocel: A Structural Biomaterial. Implex Corp, Allendale, NJ
- Insall, JN, Dorr, LD, Scott, RD, Scott, WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 248: pp. 13-14
- Klein, GR, Levine, HB, Hartzband, MA (2008) Removal of a well-fixed trabecular metal monoblock tibial component. J Arthroplasty. 23: pp. 619-622 CrossRef
- Kurtz, S, Mowat, F, Ong, K, Chan, N, Lau, E, Halpern, M (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87: pp. 1487-1497 CrossRef
- Laskin, RS (2002) Session III: Total knee replacement in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 404: pp. 100-101 CrossRef
- Levitz, CL, Lotke, PA, Karp, JS (1995) Long-term changes in bone mineral density following total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 321: pp. 68-72
- Lonner, JH, Klotz, M, Levitz, C, Lotke, PA (2001) Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty. 16: pp. 107-111 CrossRef
- Mazess, RB (1982) On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 165: pp. 239-252
- McHorney, CA, Ware, JE, Lu, JF, Sherbourne, CD (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 32: pp. 40-66 CrossRef
- McHorney, CA, Ware, JE, Raczek, AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 31: pp. 247-263 CrossRef
- O’Keefe TJ, Winter S, Lewallen DG, Robertson DD, Poggie RA. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 July 27 [Epub ahead of print].
- Petersen, MM (2000) Bone mineral measurements at the knee using dual photon and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: methodological evaluation and clinical studies focusing on adaptive bone remodeling following lower extremity fracture, total knee arthroplasty, and partial versus total meniscectomy. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 293: pp. 1-37
- Petersen, MM, Nielsen, PT, Lauritzen, JB, Lund, B (1995) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand. 66: pp. 513-516 CrossRef
- Robertsson, O, Dunbar, MJ, Knutson, K, Lidgren, L (2000) Past incidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed. Acta Orthop Scand. 71: pp. 376-380 CrossRef
- Robertsson, O, Knutson, K, Lewold, S, Lidgren, L (2001) The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975–1997: an update with special emphasis on 41, 223 knees operated on in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 72: pp. 503-513 CrossRef
- Sanchez Marquez, JM, Del Sel, N, Leali, A, Gonzalez Della Valle, A (2009) Case reports: Tantalum debris dispersion during revision of a tibial component for TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467: pp. 1107-1110 CrossRef
- Seitz, P, Ruegsegger, P, Gschwend, N, Dubs, L (1987) Changes in local bone density after knee arthroplasty: the use of quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 69: pp. 407-411
- Soininvaara, TA, Miettinen, HJ, Jurvelin, JS, Suomalainen, OT, Alhava, EM, Kroger, HP (2004) Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 75: pp. 600-605 CrossRef
- Wang, CJ, Wang, JW, Ko, JY, Weng, LH, Huang, CC (2006) Three-year changes in bone mineral density around the knee after a six-month course of oral alendronate following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: pp. 267-272 CrossRef
- Do Porous Tantalum Implants Help Preserve Bone?: Evaluation of Tibial Bone Density Surrounding Tantalum Tibial Implants in TKA
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 468, Issue 10 , pp 2739-2745
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- 2. Minneapolis Veterans Administration Medical Center Section 112E, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA
- 3. HealthEast Osteoporosis Center, St Paul, MN, USA
- 4. HealthEast Research and Education, St Paul, MN, USA