Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 10, pp 2739–2745

Do Porous Tantalum Implants Help Preserve Bone?: Evaluation of Tibial Bone Density Surrounding Tantalum Tibial Implants in TKA

Authors

  • Alicia K. Harrison
    • Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Minnesota Medical School
    • Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Minnesota Medical School
    • Minneapolis Veterans Administration Medical Center Section 112E
  • Christine Simonelli
    • HealthEast Osteoporosis Center
  • Penny J. Tatman
    • HealthEast Research and Education
  • Mary C. Schoeller
    • HealthEast Osteoporosis Center
Clinical Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1222-y

Cite this article as:
Harrison, A.K., Gioe, T.J., Simonelli, C. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 468: 2739. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1222-y

Abstract

Background

TKA with conventional metal-backed tibial implants subjects the tibial metaphysis to stress shielding, with resultant loss of bone density.

Questions/purposes

We hypothesized tibial bone mineral density in patients with porous tantalum (trabecular metal) tibial baseplates would (1) more closely parallel tibial bone mineral density in the nonoperative control limb and (2) be better maintained than in conventional historical controls.

Patients and Methods

We prospectively followed 41 patients (35 men, six women) 60 years of age or younger undergoing TKA with uncemented trabecular metal tibial components. Patients underwent dual-energy xray absorptiometry scans of both proximal tibiae preoperatively and at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. We determined bone mineral density in three selected regions of interest (Zone 1, between the pegs; Zone 2, beneath the pegs; Zone 3, directly below entire baseplate). Precision analysis revealed a precision error of 4% or less for each region of interest, indicating adequate power to detect bone mineral density changes of 8% or greater.

Results

Bone mineral density percent change was different between the operative and nonoperative knees only in Zone 3 and only at 2 months. There was no change in bone mineral density in any zone in the nonoperative knee at any time. Only in Zone 3 did the bone mineral density decrease at 2 months in the operative knee.

Conclusions

Trabecular metal implants appear to maintain tibial bone mineral density in a parallel fashion to the nonoperative limb in this population and better than historical controls.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2010