Quality Measurement in Orthopaedics: The Purchasers’ View
While all of medicine is under pressure to increase transparency and accountability, joint replacement subspecialists will face special scrutiny. Disclosures of questionable consulting fees, a demographic shift to younger patients, and uncertainty about the marginal benefits of product innovation in a time of great cost pressure invite a serious and progressive response from the profession. Current efforts to standardize measures by the National Quality Forum and PQRI will not address the concerns of purchasers, payors, or policy makers. Instead, they will ask the profession to document its commitment to appropriateness, stewardship of resources, coordination of care, and patient-centeredness. One mechanism for addressing these expectations is voluntary development of a uniform national registry for joint replacements that includes capture of preoperative appropriateness indicators, device monitoring information, revision rates, and structured postoperative patient followup. A national registry should support performance feedback and quality improvement activity, but it must also be designed to satisfy payor, purchaser, policymaker, and patient needs for information. Professional societies in orthopaedics should lead a collaborative process to develop metrics, infrastructure, and reporting formats that support continuous improvement and public accountability.
- Canadian Institute for Health Information, Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) 2007 Annual Report—Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CIHI; 2008:59.
- Connelly LB, Woolf A, Brooks P. Cost–effectiveness of interventions for musculoskeletal conditions. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, Jha P, Mills A, Musgrove P, eds. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006: 963–980. Available at: http://files.dcp2.org/pdf/DCP/DCP51.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 national hospital discharge survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;5:1–20. Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov. Accessed Nov. 1, 2008.
- Eikelboom JW, Karthikeyan G, Fagel N, Hirsh J. American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons and American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty differ: what are the implications for clinicians and patients? Chest. 2009;135:513–520. CrossRef
- Feder BJ. U.S. settles with hip and knee makers. New York Times.September 27, 2007; Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/business/27cnd-device.html?_r=1. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- Friedman RJ, Gallus AS, Cushner FD, Fitzgerald G, Anderson FA Jr, Global Orthopaedic Registry Investigators. Physician compliance with guidelines for deep-vein thrombosis prevention in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:87–97.
- Gaudiani VA, Grunkemeier GL, Castro LJ, Fisher AL, Wu Y. The risks and benefits of reoperative aortic valve replacement. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:E170–E173. CrossRef
- Global Orthopaedic Registry. Available at: http://www.outcomes-umassmed.org/GLORY/index.cfm. Accessed June 20, 2009.
- Graves SE, Wells V. A review of joint replacement surgery and its outcomes: appropriateness of prostheses and patient selection. Australian Centre for Health Research Ltd. October 2006, p. 52. Available at: http://www.achr.com.au/pdfs/Graves.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- Hauser DL, Wessinger SJ, Condon RT, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel DP, Gillis DJ, Merrill DR, Chaisson D, Freiberg AA, Estok DM, Rubash HE, Malchau H, Harris WH. An electronic database for outcome studies that includes digital radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 Suppl 1):71–75.
- Hayashi A. Building a national joint replacement registry. AAOS Now. March 2008; Available at: http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/mar08/cover2.asp. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- Jiranek W. Building a statewide registry to monitor joint implantations.” XM Radio Reach MD Podcast. Hill MN, host. Focus on Public Health Policy Series. Available at: http://www.reachmd.com/xmsegment.aspx?sid=3607. Accessed June 20, 2009.
- Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. Employer Health Benefits 2007 Annual Survey. Available at: http://www.kff.org/insurance/7672/upload/76723.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2009.
- Kim S. Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997–2004. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:481–488. CrossRef
- Malchau H, Garellick G, Eisler T, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:19–29. CrossRef
- Meier B. A call for a warning system on artificial joints. New York Times. July 29, 2008.
- Milstein, A. Medical homes — and medical “home runs”? Health Affairs Blog. September 10th, 2008; Available at: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2008/09/10/medical-homes-and-medical-home-runs/?source=promo. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- National Health Service Guidance on the Routine Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_092647. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- Paxton EW, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian DC. The Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry. The Permanente Journal. 2008;12:3.
- Puvimanasinghe JP, Takkenberg JJ, Edwards MB, Eijkemans MJ, Steyerberg EW, Van Herwerden LA, Taylor KM, Grunkemeier GL, Habbema JD, Bogers AJ. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation. Heart. 2004;90:1172–1178. CrossRef
- Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Escobar A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Lafuente I. Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1576–1584. CrossRef
- Quintana JM, Escobar A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Bilboa A. Appropriateness of total hip joint replacement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:315–321. CrossRef
- Sirio CA, Jones J, Pei Y, Meacock K, Roberts MS; Academy for Health Services Research and Health Policy. Total knee replacement in Southwest Pennsylvania—assessing utilization, post-operative complications and hospital readmission using a statewide database. Abstr Acad Health Serv Res Health Policy Meet. 2000; 17. Available at: http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102272675.html. Accessed July 21, 2009.
- U.S. employers’ health benefit cost continues to rise at twice inflation rate, Mercer survey finds. 2007. Mercer LLC website. Available at: http://www.mercer.com/referencecontent.htm?idContent=1287790; Accessed June 20, 2009.
- Wennberg DE. Variation in the delivery of health care: the stakes are high. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:866–868.
- Quality Measurement in Orthopaedics: The Purchasers’ View
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Volume 467, Issue 10 , pp 2548-2555
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors