Expediency and human health: The regulation of environmental chromium
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The complexity of chromium chemistry makes it an ideal example of how the Principle of Expediency, first articulated by sanitary pioneer Earle Phelps, can be used in a standard setting. Expediency, defined by Phelps as “the attempt to reduce the numerical measure of probable harm, or the logical measure of existing hazard, to the lowest level that is practicable and feasible within the limitations of financial resources and engineering skill”, can take on negative connotations unless subject to ethical guidance. In this paper we argue that without ethical principles as a rubric for negotiating environmental regulations, communities run the risk of slipping from the Principle of Expediency as defined by Phelps to the alternative usage of expediency meaning that which does not reflect ethical consideration or concern beyond self-serving interest. Three ethical ideals—justice, mercy and humility—are suggested as values to be considered while resolving regulatory issues related to environmental protection. The Principle of Expediency serves as a working principle, but not as a rigid algorithm, for setting regulatory limits for environmental concentrations of waste products like chromium.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Ahearne, J., former Executive Director, Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society; former Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and former Vice-President and Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future. Personal communication, 1997.
- Phelps, E.B. (1948) Public Health Engineering. A Tetbook of the Principles of Environmental Sanitation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- Bartlett, R.J. (1991) Chromium cycling in soils and water: links, gaps, and methods, Environmenmtal Health Perspectives 92:17–24. CrossRef
- Yassi, A, & Nieboer, E. (1988) Carcinogenicity of chromium compounds. Ch. 17, in: Nriagu, J.O. & Nieboer, E. (eds.) Chromium in the Natural and Human Environments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
- Schardt, D. & Schmidt, S. (1996) Chromium. Nutrition Action Health Letter, 23: 10–11.
- Anderson, R.A. (1989) Essentiality of chromium in humans. The Science of the Total Environment, Special Issue: The Chromium Paradox in Modern Life 86: 75–81.
- Nieboer, E. & Shaw, S.L. (1988) Mutagenic and other genotoxic effects of chromium compounds, Ch. 16, in: Nrigau, J.O. & Nieboer, E. (eds.) Chromium in the Natural and Human Environments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
- U.S. EPA (1988) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) for Chromium (III): Oral RfD Assessment. www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/irisdat/0028.DAT
- Bartlett, R.J. & James, B.R. (1979) Behavior of chromium in soils: III oxidation, Journal of Environmental Quality 8: 31–35.
- Fendorf, S.E. (1995) Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters, Geoderma 67: 55–71. CrossRef
- Palmer, C.D. & Puls, R.W. (1994) Natural attenuation of hexavalent chromium in ground water and soils, U.S. EPA. EPA/540/S-94/505.
- James, B.R. & Bartlett, R.J. (1983) Behavior of chromium in soils: VI Interactions between oxidation-reduction and organic complexation, Journal of Environmental Quality 12(2): 173–176.
- U.S. EPA (1994) Soil Screening Guidance, Washington, DC, U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA/540/R-94/101.
- James, B.R. (1996) The challenge of remediating chromium-contaminated soil, Environmental Science & Technology 30(6):248A-251A.
- Shriver, M. (1996) Chromium, Dateline NBC- March 22, 1996.
- James, B.R., Petura, J.C., Vitale, R.J., & Mussoline, G.R. (1995) Hexavalent chromium extraction from soils: a comparison of five methods, Environmental Science & Technology 29: 2377–2381. CrossRef
- James, B.R. (1994) Hexavalent chromium solubility and reduction in alkaline soils enriched with chromite ore processing residue, Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 227–233. CrossRef
- Nethercott, J.R. (1996) Setting environmental standards for prevention of chromium dermatitis. Chromium Symposium-1996, Industrial Health Foundation.
- U.S. EPA (1991b) Rules and regulations: Chromium (III) compounds; toxic chemical release reporting; community right-to-know: Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 56(226):58859–58862.
- Bartlett, R.J. (1986a) Chromium oxidation in soils and water: measurements and mechanisms, Proceedings of the Chromium Symposium: Update, 1986, Industrial Health Foundation.
- James, B.R. (1992) The uses and misuses by regulatory agencies of the research of Bruce James on the redox chemistry of chromium in soils, Hexavalent Chromium Analytical Methods Workshop, Industrial Health Foundation, Inc.
- Bartlett, L.B. & Vesilind, P.A. (1996) Earle Bernard Phelps: Potomologist, Environmental Engineer 32(2).
- Mish, F.C., ed. (1985) Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Miriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield.
- Stroup, R.L. (1996) Superfund: the shortcut that failed, Political Economy Research Center (PERC) Policy Series. www.perc.org.
- Whitbeck, C. (1996) Ethics as design. Doing justice to moral problems, Hastings Center Report 26: 9–16. CrossRef
- Carrington, C.D. (1997b) An administrative view of model uncertainty in public health, Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 8: 273–286.
- Cooney, C.M. (1997) N.J. hazardous waste cleanup funds now guaranteed by constitution, Environmental Science & Technology, January.
- English, E.S. ed. (1976) Holy Bible. Oxford University Press, New York.
About this Article
- Expediency and human health: The regulation of environmental chromium
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 4, Issue 2 , pp 191-201
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links