The Disaster of the Impact Factor
- Khaled Moustafa
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Journal impact factor (IF) is a value calculated annually based on the number of times articles published in a journal are cited in two, or more, of the preceding years. At the time of its inception in 1955 (Garfield 1955), the inventor of the impact factor did not imagine that 1 day his tool would become a controversial and abusive measure, as he confessed 44 years later (Garfield 1999). The impact factor became a major detrimental factor of quality, creating huge pressures on authors, editors, stakeholders and funders. More tragically, in some countries the number of publications in journals with “high impact factors” condition the allocation of government funding for entire institutions (Plos Medicine Editorial 2006). Based on the assumption that IF reflects scientific quality, the impact factor produces a widespread impression of prestige and reputation, though no experimental data support this hypothesis (Brembs et al. 2013).
The impact factor was originally conceived as a bibliome
- Abbasi, K. (2007). Why journals can live without impact factor and cluster bombs. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(3), 113. CrossRef
- Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Citation impact. Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Science, 334(6061), 1344–1345. CrossRef
- Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafo, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontier Human Neuroscience, 7, 291.
- Editorial, Nature. (2005). Not-so-deep impact. Nature, 435(7045), 1003–1004.
- Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109(42), 17028–17033. CrossRef
- Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. CrossRef
- Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. CMAJ, 161(8), 979–980.
- Hvistendahl, M. (2013). China’s publication bazaar. Science, 342(6162), 1035–1039. CrossRef
- * Nature website showing the impact factors of NPG journals: http://www.nature.com/npg_/company_info/impact_factors.html. Accessed 07 January 2014.
- Plos Medicine Editorial. (2006). The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Medicine, 3(6), e291. CrossRef
- Rogers, L. F. (2002). Impact factor: The numbers game. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(3), 541–542. CrossRef
- Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179, 1091–1092. CrossRef
- San Francisco Declaration of Research Assesment (DORA). http://am.ascb.org/dora/. Accessed 07 January 2014.
- Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314(7079), 498–502. CrossRef
- Van Noorden, R. (2013). Brazilian citation scheme outed. Nature, 500(29), 510. CrossRef
- The Disaster of the Impact Factor
Science and Engineering Ethics
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Khaled Moustafa (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institut Mondor de la Recherche Biomédicale (INSERM), Créteil, France